Roxburghe, And "Civil Procedures Parts 31.16 and 31.17"

HO87

Oopsadaisy wrote: »

That's a stretch way way too far [are you by any chance a churnalist on the Daily Mail???].

No. Apparently they felt I was not right-wing enough to qualify. It seems that standing up for the rights of the "little man" against the depredations of big business is deemed to be socialist. I did try to point out that by any standard measure the companies concerned did not qualify as businesses because they were simply tax farmers. That was it. They snapped my pencil, tore the pages out of my notebook and sent me off to The Guardian. I can spell - nead eye saigh moor?

I do know of a case (back in 2006 though) when Michael Sobell actually made it to court. He still lost though - no mention of Graham White's however - read here.