We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Asking Tenants to Vacate

2

Comments

  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    edited 14 December 2011 at 11:02PM
    clutton wrote: »

    Teri - Assuming you live in England -
    It doesn't matter *where* Terri lives - it's where the rental property is that counts, and its either under the law applicable to both Eng/Wales or its Scotland with its separate legal set up. So assuming Eng or Wales:
    clutton wrote: »
    i am a LL of 12 years and to answer your question, a tenant who is still in the fixed period of the original tenancy agreement cannot be forced to leave (unless s/he owes 2 months rent or more) prior to the end of the agreement.
    That two months has to be owing at the time of application to the court and at the time of the court hearing itself (because, importantly, a court order has to be obtained)
    clutton wrote: »
    After the agreement ends the agreement automatically becomes a Statutory Periodic tenancy, and a tenant must be given a Section 21 notice which is 2 months notice, ending at the end of a rental period.
    It only becomes a stat periodic if a new Fixed Term has not been signed up for and the T remains in occupation.

    Note that a S21 can be timed to align with the expiry of the Fixed Term, with the LL applying to court for repossession of the property, immediately after that expiry date.
    clutton wrote: »
    so if your friend moved in on the 1st of the month, the notice must end on the last day of the month.
    It is not when the T moved in to the property that determines the start/end date of the stat periodic. If the expiry date of a T's Fixed Term is 15th of the month, then tenancy periods will run on from 16th to 15th of subsequent months. T may in fact have moved in on the 21st of the month or any day other than the 16th.


    Edit: Terri -
    Note that if your friend paid a tenancy deposit (or signed up for a new Fixed Term after Apr 6 2007 then LL should have scheme registered that deposit and give him/her the scheme's prescribed info. Any S21 served without such registration will be invalid. Ts in that situation should keep quiet and let the LL find out that they have to start over - it gives the T extra time if they need it.

    Your friend can check their rights with Shelter, via their website or their helpline.
  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    I
    This is a person who badly need to join a landlord's association. The advice they are seeking would then be freely available. And reliably accurate
    ....even the LL associations can get things wrong. Remember, for example, the RLA and their incorrect stance on how to get round the deposit regs?
  • clutton wrote: »
    Well Teri - the smug sarky so-and-sos who have responded in their usual manner on this thread, have been caught out at last.. they are used to taking the mickey out of new landlords who come here for help... claiming they are pro tenant.. but here you are asking on behalf of a tenant friend. !! very funny guys very amusing

    Thanks for advice.

    I post quite a lot on the Techie Forum - and the people on there are really nice and helpful.

    A couple members on this forum do appear quite smug and seem to enjoy having a dig at others. Not nice at all.
  • dodger1
    dodger1 Posts: 4,579 Forumite
    I wonder how long this person has been a landlord for and why they don't know how to bring a tenancy to an end? it's a bit worrying, really.

    This is a person who badly need to join a landlord's association. The advice they are seeking would then be freely available. And reliably accurate
    Did I say I am a landlord?

    Just asking on behalf of someone who needs a little more time and has received an informal letter - looks like he has a bit longer.

    Thanks people.

    Bitters quote doesn't state you are the LL, he clearly states "this person". This person refers to the LL whether that was you or not.
    It's someone else's fault.
  • LandyAndy
    LandyAndy Posts: 26,377 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    Did I say I am a landlord?

    Just asking on behalf of someone who needs a little more time and has received an informal letter - looks like he has a bit longer.

    Thanks people.


    Why not say that in the OP?
  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    edited 15 December 2011 at 9:58AM
    LandyAndy wrote: »
    Why not say that in the OP?

    Yes, the OP could be rad (edit: read!) either way, as being asked by/on behalf of a T or a LL but essentially the procedure for correct service of a S21 doesn't alter, regardless of who asks the question.
  • LandyAndy
    LandyAndy Posts: 26,377 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    tbs624 wrote: »
    Yes, the Op could be rad either way, as being asked by/on behalf of a T or a LL but essentially the procedure for correct service of a S21 doesn't alter, regardless of who asks the question.

    Indeed but some posters are being berated for their posts when those posts are not unreasonable under one valid (albeit erroneous) interpretation of the OP.
  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    LandyAndy wrote: »
    Indeed but some posters are being berated for their posts when those posts are not unreasonable under one valid (albeit erroneous) interpretation of the OP.

    Posters must not "berate" any LLs ( even dozy ones or downright criminal ones). It will upset Clutton.;)
  • tbs624 wrote: »
    Posters must not "berate" any LLs ( even dozy ones or downright criminal ones). It will upset Clutton.;)

    Posters shouldn't berate anyone. Why do people feel the need to have a dig at one another. Life is too short.

    Thanks for replies, friend is OK. Deposit is in place too.

    Have a good Christmas everyone.
  • Clutton was absolutely correct: my responses were smug and sarky because I misinterpreted the OP's question, which I now realise was ambiguous and I made the wrong assumption because of my deep-rooted anti-LL stance.

    Apologies all round.

    Note to self: read the ruddy first post properly and try to stop your prejudices from making false assumptions.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.