We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is it reasonable to ask for a replacement/refund?

SurreyChris
Posts: 27 Forumite

Two months ago I bought a jacket from Debenhams which cost £120 and today the zip broke. Would it be reasonable to take it back and ask for a replacement?
Chris
Chris
0
Comments
-
You can certainly ask. However Debs can offer a repair, replacement or a refund. They can refuse your request if it is disproportionately costly compared to another remedy.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0
-
Thanks, I didn't realise they did repairs.0
-
Hi If you can prove that the coat has not been subject to extreem wear and tear ie it not all in tatters then the Sale of Goods Act is quite clear that the item is not of merchatable quality and you are entitled to a refund, exchange or repair. It is NOT at the discretion of the shop to decide which you should take. This is enshired in law and don't let them fob you off and it has nothing to do with the cost to the shop. Good Luck!!0
-
Hi If you can prove that the coat has not been subject to extreem wear and tear ie it not all in tatters then the Sale of Goods Act is quite clear that the item is not of merchatable quality and you are entitled to a refund, exchange or repair. It is NOT at the discretion of the shop to decide which you should take. This is enshired in law and don't let them fob you off and it has nothing to do with the cost to the shop. Good Luck!!0
-
Hi If you can prove that the coat has not been subject to extreem wear and tear ie it not all in tatters then the Sale of Goods Act is quite clear that the item is not of merchatable quality and you are entitled to a refund, exchange or repair. It is NOT at the discretion of the shop to decide which you should take. This is enshired in law and don't let them fob you off and it has nothing to do with the cost to the shop. Good Luck!!
Again, you seem to have limited knowledge of the SoGA.
OP bought the jacket 2 months ago. Therefore the burden of proof is on the retailer to prove the problem is due to wear n tear/misuse. The OP has to prove nothing as it is assumed the fault was inherent within the first 6 months after purchase.
Again, "enshired in law" :rotfl: is the exact opposite of what you are saying. Read below (copied and pasted from the SoGA itself):
(3)The buyer must not require the seller to repair or, as the case may be, replace the goods if that remedy is—
(a)impossible, or
(b)disproportionate in comparison to the other of those remedies, or
(c)disproportionate in comparison to an appropriate reduction in the purchase price under paragraph (a), or rescission under paragraph (b), of section 48C(1) below.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0 -
unholyangel wrote: »OP bought the jacket 2 months ago. Therefore the burden of proof is on the retailer to prove the problem is due to wear n tear/misuse. The OP has to prove nothing as it is assumed the fault was inherent within the first 6 months after purchase.
Thanks everyone, I just wanted to check that going back after two months would be considered reasonable.
There's no damage to the rest of the jacket so hopefully it should be ok.0 -
SurreyChris wrote: »Thanks everyone, I just wanted to check that going back after two months would be considered reasonable.
There's no damage to the rest of the jacket so hopefully it should be ok.
Just to reiterate, two months for a jacket that cost £120 is def reasonable and as other posters have said, under statute you are entitled to repair, refund or exchange (whichever you prefer).0 -
SharkyGeorge wrote: »Just to reiterate, two months for a jacket that cost £120 is def reasonable and as other posters have said, under statute you are entitled to repair, refund or exchange (whichever you prefer).
No!
It's entirely up to the retailer0 -
SharkyGeorge wrote: »Just to reiterate, two months for a jacket that cost £120 is def reasonable and as other posters have said, under statute you are entitled to repair, refund or exchange (whichever you prefer).
you cannot say what you want i suggest you read the SoGA. this is 100% upto the retailer to what solution they offer.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards