We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Pension Age Going Up and Strikes Public Sector
Comments
-
Re: fitness for work in old age this is from the "heads of agreement":4. These changes may impact more on certain categories of staff within theand physically demanding roles including emergency services.
NHS. As a result, it is agreed to set up a tripartite review between DH,
NHS Employers and the NHS Trade Unions on addressing the impact of
working longer in the NHS with particular reference to staff in frontline
I'm aware a consultant (working beyond current SPA) in A&E was removed from the job this week, just couldn't think quick enough.
0 -
One other thing nobody seems to have mentioned is that those TUPE'd out of the NHS will be able to remain as active members, that is a BIG win for the unions with the current pace of privatisation.
The practicalities of that should prove interesting. Presumably some ex-public sector workers on FS pensions lining up alongside newer employees with much inferior (if any) pension provision.
Could that eventually lead to pay differentials to compensate ?0 -
Average salary pension!
But agree, looks interesting. Many of my colleagues have a pretty short term view and would come out of the pension if they were offered a few quid by a new employer anyway.0 -
Old_Slaphead wrote: »The practicalities of that should prove interesting. Presumably some ex-public sector workers on FS pensions lining up alongside newer employees with much inferior (if any) pension provision.
Could that eventually lead to pay differentials to compensate ?
many of the past contractorisation exercise obliged the new employer to provide a "broadly comparable" pension to transferees rather than the fairly minimal standard required under TUPE so its not that new.
Annecedotally the transferees are either really needed by the new employer due to specialist skills/knowledge in which case they are happy to pay "big bucks" for them (or buy them out into a new contract) or, if they are not that essential they just them stagnant in pay terms until they leave/kick them out under ET&O reasons0 -
Average salary pension!
Ooops, thanks for the correction - I meant "some ex public sector workers on partFS/partAS pensions" (pity the payroll/pension dept!)
if they are not that essential they just them stagnant in pay terms until they leave
I suspect that's the downside of any TUPE'd deal0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards