EXTENDED: You've got another week to add your travel & holiday deals questions for expert MSE Oli as part of the latest Ask An Expert event.
'Dear teachers – an important letter about your pupils' future' blog discussion
in Martin's blogs & appearances & MoneySavingExpert in the news
12 replies 2.9K views
Former_MSE_Penelope Former MSE
This is the discussion to link on the back of Martin's blog. Please read the blog first, as this discussion follows it.
Please click 'post reply' to discuss below.
Read Martin's "Dear teachers – an important letter about your pupils' future" Blog.
Please click 'post reply' to discuss below.
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides
Energy Price Cap change
Martin Lewis on what it means for youMSE News
Best £1 you've ever spent?
Share your most impressive bargainsMSE Forum
New MSE Forum avatars available
Try 'em out nowMSE Forum
a) Maybe the higher fees are putting off those who just go to uni to 'have a laugh' as they don't know what else to do - quite a few people on my course just weren't bothered about actual learning
b) If foreign students are rising and domestic ones falling - domestic ones may be at a disadvantage to the foreign students in terms of employment in the future
c) There are a lot of graduates out there with no job or one not related to what they want to be doing - so whilst in the past a university degree gave you a better chance in life I don't think this holds true anymore (and I mean generally not just for those who do perceived easy subjects like Hospitality Management etc.)
Many people would be better off to study part time then, if they do well and are serious about their subject, enter the full-time academic system at a point where people around them are equally passionate about their work.
Maybe the reduction is partly due to thinking along these lines. Are there surveys suggesting one way or the other?
Also there is massive variation between Universities - my local university is up 2%.
By the way "... they rarely explain it bares only a passing resemblance ..." ... um - "bears", I hope ...
I assume that they will not have degrees in medai studies or football studies then?
I do think there are far too many 'noddy' courses and I think University is not for everyone. There should be far more industrial and commercial as well as technical apprenticeships so that young peopel have a proper choice and don't just drift into University doing something that is useless.
Fees? I think people studying to be Doctors, Teachers and Business leaders and other things that will be useful to society should be subsidised but those signed up for David Beckham Studies or Klingon should pay through the nose.
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton
I certainly see your argument, but what counts as "useful"?
My academic qualifications are primarily in mathematics. They lean toward the pure side and include a dose of history/philosophy of mathematics. If we go to the Greek argument, philosophy and mathematics are essential for everyone who wants to achieve a higher understanding of the world - so they're an essential foundation for any intellectual pursuit right up to leadership of a nation.
But if we look at the modern approach of increased specialisation, it might be argued that I was wasting society's money as what I studied was far too vague to have direct applicability. Hardy famously celebrated inapplicability - what would today's beancounter say about this? Should the more recently discovered relevance of number theory to cryptography (whence national security and war) change our attitude toward his work?
And perhaps I could have exploited my numeracy to go into casino banking - not sure how much of society I'd have helped then .
I don't have a proper answer but I think the solution lies somewhere in making sure that university courses, however they specialise, are thoroughly challenging to the mind. But that goal is damn hard to measure and standards agencies tend to waste educators' time with lowest common denominator rules which ultimately reduce standards. It gets even worse when universities are measured by their ability to reach the goals their administrators have set and are funded per bum remaining on seat: could there be a better incentive to set your standards as low as possible? Let's give control back to academics who have a track record of excellence in their field.
Yeah, I know we've been going the other way since the '80s and I'm just rambling.