We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
house v location , is it really the location that matters?
Comments
-
Hi, I lived in NottingHill and I would have to agree that is really is not that special.
In my humble opinion it is down to what you are looking for?
I moved to Bucks and got a 2 bed/garden & Garage for money that would not buy me a Studio in Nottinghill, so it is a question of what you want?
An Expensive Rabbit Hutch in a Over rated area or a spacious home with nice views etc..
Anyway all areas have thier downsides.
Look for areas with lots of developments going on as I am told in the future this increases values of property.
Hope this helps and good luck :O) p.s check out Right Move thats where I found my Home.0 -
I agree its best to buy a bad house in a good location but as has been said here it depends why. I live 50 yards from the boundary of a catchment area of a good school. Identical houses 100 yards from mine are £50,000 more expensive because of this. If you have no kids and the house is small (not trying to re-sell to a family) then you would be happier in my area rather than across the road. Another important thing is that you live among similar people - try https://www.upmystreet.co.uk to assess potential properties for 'fit'.0
-
Easy to say that a good location is always best, but not everyone can afford this for their first ( or even second / +) purchase.
Many people stay in less desirable areas and often pay quite good prices for the priviledge. If the area is fine for you (hopefully, not too rough and you do not have the downside of a 'poor' school to worry about) then the only time it will matter is when you are re-selling.
You will still benefit from any general increases in property values, and - some previously 'bad' locations are now coming up in value as they are so affordable, so you could do well over time.1373/100000 -
It depends on the buyer. Personally I'd prefer to live in a falling down house in a nice area over a sorted house in a shoddy area. I can fix the house but not the area.Happy chappy0
-
littlescarlet wrote:I agree its best to buy a bad house in a good location but as has been said here it depends why. I live 50 yards from the boundary of a catchment area of a good school. Identical houses 100 yards from mine are £50,000 more expensive because of this. If you have no kids and the house is small (not trying to re-sell to a family) then you would be happier in my area rather than across the road. Another important thing is that you live among similar people - try https://www.upmystreet.co.uk to assess potential properties for 'fit'.
Ok there is no such thing as a cathment area for a school its a myth. Our lass works for a very well regarded school in nw london and the house prices are ridiculous near the school and she has turned the majority away as they don't fit the criteria so please beware!!!0 -
ExpertBargainHunter wrote:I'm a chartered surveyor covering central London and YES it's TOTALLY down to location! For example, I've just valued a large Victorian house. It has 5 storeys, is in great condition and has a nice roof terrace. The houses at the other end of the street (ie 200 yards away) are similar and are currently achieving £1300 per square foot. The property I was valuing is opposite a small council estate and backs onto the A40 (6 lane very busy road). I valued it £600 per square foot.
Location is everything. Damp only costs £2000 to remedy, new kitchen and bathroom £20,000. Put a property near a busy road or council estate, or in a high crime/noisy area with no shops/tube nearby and watch the value plummet.
At the end of the day though, as long as YOU don't consider it a bad area and have done your research then go for it. A lot of places are expensive due to snob value (ie I think Notting Hill is rubbish and wouldn't particularly want to live there but it's the place to live) and you can get a nicer flat/house in a more diverse place for less. Just make sure you understand WHY the prices are lower and make the judgement.
Good luck!
ok your a surveyor but £2k for damp!!!!! and £20k for kitchen and bathroom!!!!!!! yeh maybe in a 6 bed £2 million pound house but not as a general rule.
Don't discount anything just do your homework.0 -
Hi thanks for the replies. the area i live in is in west yorkshire, but i probably live in one of the best towns its a former spa town with a famous moor!.
i have a little boy aged 1 and the schools in my town are very good, however the school near to the new area is equally good. However I only live 5 mins walk from the town centre at the moment and it has great shops, really good quality restaurants(not that i get out too much at the moment). We also have a direct train line to leeds and bradford which put the house prices up.
The other area is nice but is on the outskirts of another town(not within walking distance to any shops or the train station) so it would mean that we would have to become a two car family again.
I think the deciding factor is going to be my sons childhood/future as the facilities here are really good and i have a great childminder which i would also have to change.
Just wish i could afford a bigger house with a garden instead of a back yard!.Grocery Challenge Feb 14 £500 / Spent £572.10!
March 14 £500 / spent £488.45 :j0 -
pinkparrott wrote:Hi thanks for the replies. the area i live in is in west yorkshire, but i probably live in one of the best towns its a former spa town with a famous moor!.
i have a little boy aged 1 and the schools in my town are very good, however the school near to the new area is equally good. However I only live 5 mins walk from the town centre at the moment and it has great shops, really good quality restaurants(not that i get out too much at the moment). We also have a direct train line to leeds and bradford which put the house prices up.
The other area is nice but is on the outskirts of another town(not within walking distance to any shops or the train station) so it would mean that we would have to become a two car family again.
I think the deciding factor is going to be my sons childhood/future as the facilities here are really good and i have a great childminder which i would also have to change.
Just wish i could afford a bigger house with a garden instead of a back yard!.
i dont have kids so im not in your position but it would be a lot easier to move now rather than when they start school etc.0 -
I too am having a bit of a location v. available space dilemma. One of the properties we are considering is an ex council house. It is only one street (cul de sac) of council houses and most seem to be privately owned. A lovely new estate has been attached to it (some of the houses are part of the same road) and houses a stones throw away go for between 200-500K. The house we like has been extended and is up for £179K (although the highest sold price is 127K for a non extended house). Am I likely to have more resale difficulties with an ex council house despite it offereing more space than more expensive houses in the area?0
-
I would so stay where you are - it sounds lovely. My husband and I bought the same size house at the same time as my ex-flat mate and we paid £50,000 more to live in a nice village - where she opted for what I call a rough area and it is worth it - nice people, no nuisance youths, a sense of community, knowing your neighbours and I mean doors and doors down - my friend dare not venture out and always thinks she will go back to a burgled house. I would pay the extra money anyday for a nice location.
As for the person considering ex-council - not a problem per se - but issues with mortgages - most companies will not touch local authority property - don't know why but this may reduce the mortgage companies you go for - but if you are a cash buyer and the area is nice - why not go for it. My friend (another one) bought an ex council house 6 years ago for £50,000 and it has been valued at £170,000 - although it is ex council in a village which is georgous.Food and Smellies Shop target £50 pw - managed average of £49 per week in 2013 down to £38.90 per week in 20160
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards