We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Standard Life - Are they Right?

I hope that this post is in the correct forum!

The reason for this post is a personal one. Having contributed for the past ten years to a Standard Life Endowment Policy, the sum of £70 per month, which equates to £8,400 in total, I am a little disappointed to have only received the less than princely total of £9,400 in return - I was expecting a far more significant return.

Does this look right?
Does anybody now if Martin has covered such a scenario in the past?
Is there any regulatory body I can contact, that I may seek possible redress?

If anybody has any suggestions or advise, thanks in advance.

Comments

  • opinions4u
    opinions4u Posts: 19,411 Forumite
    Does this look right?
    Yes. It's been a pretty poor decade for investments.

    Is there any regulatory body I can contact, that I may seek possible redress?
    Not for disappointing investment performance, no.

    I assume you still have Standard Life shares as a result of having this policy.
  • Thanks for your response.

    I do still have the shares.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,033 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 18 November 2011 at 3:41PM
    Having contributed for the past ten years to a Standard Life Endowment Policy

    Endowments were obsolete from around 1995 with most stopping selling them by 1998/9. When you bought yours, you were way past the point of them being obsolete. Std Life were the last mainstream provider in the UK to withdraw.

    So, part of the problem is that your regular investment contract was obsolete before you bought it. The other problem is that 10 years is short for a regular contribution contract. You could get away with 10 years in the 60s, 70s and 80s but the 90s onwards havent been able to. 90s suffered as there were no real stockmarket crashes or major corrections. These help with long term regular contribution plans. Then at the start of the 2000s you get a major crash that took a while to recover. Then just as it recovers, along comes the credit crunch and global recession which hits it again. Good news if you are still paying regular contributions and have over 5 years to go until you want the money. Bad news if you have a maturity.

    So, there is no wrong doing. Just the wrong contract and bad luck on timing.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Thanks for the reply - oh well, at least its better than nothing.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.