We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
No Insurance
Comments
-
I guess Dad said that son had his permission to take the car. He should have said he hadn't permission and then son would have been done for taking a vehicle without owners consent and Dad would have been in the clear.
Son is a liabilty. Anything less than a custodial sentence and, IMO, he has got away lightly.
GGThere are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.0 -
Shame that no insurance isn't imprisonable then...Debt at highest: September 2003 - £26,350 :eek:
Debt now: £14,100 :rolleyes:
Debt free day: October 2008 :beer:0 -
DavidHM wrote:Shame that no insurance isn't imprisonable then...
But then he would have gotten away with it since there is no room at the inn.
I think he should be banned, you shouldn't be on the road without insurance, road tax and a safe car. There is no excuse and he is putting lives at risk and risking causing misery.Not buying unnecessary toiletries 2024 26/53 UU, 25 IN0 -
They are lucky the car was not seized under s165 of the Road Traffic Act?!?!? As its his second time and of a youngish age excpect another ban and a MASSIVE fine!!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards