Pigsback - Free Gifts for Clicks - Newbies Please Read the First Post!!

jockettuk

i dont remember it being one of those premium rate numbers or 6 digit numbers that i got from pigsback,,, i thought it was a normal type mobile number you got and replied to.. might be wrong been a while lol

Dustykitten

Droopsnout says Hi to you all, he will be back as soon as his internet connection is sorted out.

PsychoApeMan

jules-2005 wrote:

I would but I can't edit a post once the thread has been closed. The last thread was started on 18 December, we all talk too much

Aaaaah, of course... Ah well, hopefully they'll notice we've moved on

keelykat

I did say a big thank you on the old thread, which nobody seems to be looking at now. so once again, thank you to everyone who's been helping on here with answers, links to click throughs etc- ive just passed the 1000 point mark in UNDER a week! im very pleased!

keelykat.

wanting2save

Dustykitten wrote:

Droopsnout says Hi to you all, he will be back as soon as his internet connection is sorted out.

Bless him!! Not quite been the same without his little pearls of wisdom or the odd 'spar' with funnyguy......

olliebear_2

"Pigpen said: This is the point.. pigsback CLAIM it is.. but how can it be.. noone with a HU postcode has ever won, as far as I am aware... I would LOVE to be proved wrong!"

I am going to prove you wrong...I am in the HU postcode area and I won a quiz last year. Only one win, but at least it proves that the quizzes are not North-est.

I wish there were more wins here though...mainly me! Heh heh!

susplum

Did anyone get 150pp for signing up to lightspeed?

I joined and my piggybank shows it as a clickthru for 10pp.

pennylane99

susplum wrote:

Did anyone get 150pp for signing up to lightspeed?

I joined and my piggybank shows it as a clickthru for 10pp.

I think mine took a few weeks to come through.....

Savvy_Sue

jules-2005 wrote:

I would but I can't edit a post once the thread has been closed. The last thread was started on 18 December, we all talk too much

Mostly saying the same stuff again, and again, and again ... :rotfl:

I am very grateful to Snitterling for pointing out that random doesn't LOOK random, I have said as much myself, can't remember if it's on the most recent closed thread or an earlier one. I even pointed out that Apple were de-randomising their random selection on the Ipod, because people were complaining that it wasn't random enough ...

For those of you who don't believe me (or Snitterling) with time on your hands, do the following:

1. write down your predictions for 100 coin tosses: Heads, Tails, Tails, Heads etc.

2. Now toss a coin 100 times and record the results.

Which looks more random, your prediction or the actual results?

Please don't post your answers here ... :rotfl:

PeteHerts

Not sure if someone has already said this but why dont they make the first part of the post a Sticky?