We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
What happened to the "nature of debt" thread?
pqrdef
Posts: 4,552 Forumite
It disappeared while I was reading it.
"It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis
0
Comments
-
God knows
You must have offended someone at MSE. Was a good thread.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »God knows
You must have offended someone at MSE. Was a good thread.
It suffered fundamental maths failure.
Quite serious. Terminal in fact.Not Again0 -
1984ReturnsForReal wrote: »It suffered fundamental maths failure.
Quite serious. Terminal in fact.
I didn't realise Hamish had posted on it?0 -
Looks like someone had a right moan about it. Which seems a bit sad really, as there was nothing offensive in it.
I'll repost.“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
no idea what happened to the thread.
but the OP [no prizes for guessing who] was basically making the same sorts of argument as this rather interesting opinion piece from spring 2007.
in everyone's defence it's a very, very difficult topic, one that I wouldn't claim to pretend to understand particularly well myself.FACT.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »I didn't realise Hamish had posted on it?
Now I look a dunce.
I was thinking about the wrong thread!
We mean the thread where Hamish tried, but failed to have a pop? Bless him. Sure he'll have another go. God knows he's a trier!0 -
-
It disappeared while I was reading it
Creditors were offered a 100% "haircut" :eek:'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
