Had a little giggle...

ninacasino2003

2 letters from the CSA asking for your to pay? That was a giggle?

Life must be a barrel of laughs in your house!

shedeviluk

missbunbury wrote: »

OP, I appreciate you find it funny but the CSA have followed exactly the correct procedures even if they are fully aware that you're the director, they still can impose a deduction from earnings order. If you haven't actually wound up the company, the company could end up being taken to court for failure to pay a DEO. If your PWC is aware that you are a director (which she can find out for about two quid from Companies House) then she can apply for a variation on income not taken into consideration which will mean the company will have to supply its accounts and your drawings could well be classed as income, meaning the amount you owe may yet increase. If you're not wanting to end up in trouble, I would seriously suggest you take the time to notify the CSA of your recent change in circumstance otherwise the previous maintenance calculation will remain legally payable until the CSA figure out you're on benefits for themselves, which can take quite some time.

Companies are very very rarely taken to court for non payment of deo's they just keep reschulding them. And only certain income can be used for variation purposes and if the pwc wants them SHE has to prove them it is not for the NRP to prove her wrong but the PWC to prove she is right in regards to income not taken into consideration and 99% of PWC's cant prove it they just guess it

As for notifying them you are on Benefits, they check that regualry and it will be backdated to when you went onto bens not when you notified them.

kevin137

shedeviluk wrote: »

As for notifying them you are on Benefits, they check that regualry and it will be backdated to when you went onto bens not when you notified them.

NOT TRUE

A change of circumstances can only happen if and when the NRP notifies them...! They may well check, but they are not obligated under the current system to change unless it is applied for, and as many on here will tell you, even IF you notify them, it is not a guarantee that it will happen, which is why there are so many that now will do nothing other than recorded delivery to prove such notification...

PreludeForTimeFeelers

kevin137 wrote: »

NOT TRUE

A change of circumstances can only happen if and when the NRP notifies them...! They may well check, but they are not obligated under the current system to change unless it is applied for, and as many on here will tell you, even IF you notify them, it is not a guarantee that it will happen, which is why there are so many that now will do nothing other than recorded delivery to prove such notification...

That changed with some new regulations in Spring, allowing the CSA to backdate any changes on/off benefits to when they actually occured - it meant that some arrears on older cases (where the NRPs didn't bother informing the CSA that they had left work and went on the dole) could be corrected.

CSA_Help

PreludeForTimeFeelers wrote: »

That changed with some new regulations in Spring, allowing the CSA to backdate any changes on/off benefits to when they actually occured - it meant that some arrears on older cases (where the NRPs didn't bother informing the CSA that they had left work and went on the dole) could be corrected.

PFTF

It was actually July 2011 and i had provided the CSA the legislation after consultation from a lawyer. The tribunal has now asked CMEC for comments of why they didn't do a review when i was on JSA and they were properly notified etc.

kevin137

PreludeForTimeFeelers wrote: »

That changed with some new regulations in Spring, allowing the CSA to backdate any changes on/off benefits to when they actually occured - it meant that some arrears on older cases (where the NRPs didn't bother informing the CSA that they had left work and went on the dole) could be corrected.

I stand corrected...

CSA_Help

PreludeForTimeFeelers wrote: »

Exactly - it's people like that who give NRPs a bad name.

You refering to me ?

All i am asking is for the CSA to follow their own laws

PreludeForTimeFeelers

CSA_Help wrote: »

You refering to me ?

All i am asking is for the CSA to follow their own laws

I was referring to Ses6jwg.

CSA_Help

PreludeForTimeFeelers wrote: »

I was referring to Ses6jwg.

I never read that post

PreludeForTimeFeelers

No bother, sorry for the confusion :-)