We Should All Be Running on Water As Fuel

Trevor2522_2

If only the people -- you -- woke up to alternative energy sources which are being violently repressed by the global !lite, industry and government -- yes, the one you elected.

Water can and has been split into its constituent gases by using high alternating frequencies at low-current. But inventors are routinely threatened, bribed or murdered if they fail to stop their work -- by clandestine governement agents.

Awareness is the first step. Wake up and become active. Low-energy electrolysis is a reality and will give us limitless energy for all applications once the technology becomes viral.

Google: Water-powered car, Stan Meyer, energy inventors murdred.

Nilrem

Ah a CT.

Hydrogen which is what you are talking about IS a method that IS being used in various ways to power vehicles, either directly as a fuel via a tank, or indirectly as a fuel cell (a technology that is massively safer and easier logistically to deal with, but still in it's infancy).

The problem is that it's hard to handle, dangerous (much more so than petrol or diesel, or even LPG), and hard to transport safely in usable quantities.
It also costs a fair chunk to do the electrolyses to convert the water into hydrogen, as it requires electricity to do so and to do it in large enough quantities for large scale use would require a lot of additional electrical generating capacity (in the order of a couple of new nuclear plants), and some very large facilities for the conversion and storage (facilities that would make the old gas works look safe, and the Buncefield explosion look tame if it went wrong).

The very fact that it's been known about, and experimented with for something like a hundred+ years alone is a reason for this to be a load of CT rubbish, the whole idea of separating water into it's constituent parts has been (or was) a basic part of science lessons for decades, and even before that was widely known about as it's been both a risk with some industrial processes, and a method of producing hydrogen (or oxygen depending on your end use) for various uses.

But I won't let logic get in the way of a conspiracy theory.

marlot

Now let me see ... the UK has a power generating shortage (the ageing power stations not having been replaced as successive governments have dithered). So electric cars are a non-starter in large quantity, as is splitting water into hydogen and oxygen.

We spend a fortune putting up expensive windmills and PV panels, and ignore the reliable source of energy on our doorsteps - tidal power. Nuts!

andygb

marlot wrote: »

Now let me see ... the UK has a power generating shortage (the ageing power stations not having been replaced as successive governments have dithered). So electric cars are a non-starter in large quantity, as is splitting water into hydogen and oxygen.

We spend a fortune putting up expensive windmills and PV panels, and ignore the reliable source of energy on our doorsteps - tidal power. Nuts!

Every country on the planet should be doing what the Spanish are doing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_in_Spain

And you are of course quite right about making use of tidal power. We need sustainable forms of energy now, and we have the necessary technology and more important the manpower to achieve those aims.

bob_a_builder

Every country ?

" Because of the high altitude (1,100 m) and the semi-arid climate, the site has exceptionally high annual direct insolation of 2,200 kWh/m² per year"

lets face it the uk has more tides than sun

Ebe_Scrooge

andygb wrote: »

And you are of course quite right about making use of tidal power. We need sustainable forms of energy now, and we have the necessary technology and more important the manpower to achieve those aims.

I often think that - you see all these wind farms around the place, they don't work if there's no wind, they shut them down if it's too windy .... tides occur twice a day, every day, regular as clockwork, can even be predicted years into the future .... surely tidal power must be a better option. I assume that it's the maintenance of them - machinery + salt water = problems, and more difficult to access, being underwater. Probably this makes them uneconomic at the moment ?

Imp

Trevor2522 wrote: »

If only the people -- you -- woke up to alternative energy sources which are being violently repressed by the global !lite, industry and government -- yes, the one you elected.

Water can and has been split into its constituent gases by using high alternating frequencies at low-current. But inventors are routinely threatened, bribed or murdered if they fail to stop their work -- by clandestine governement agents.

Awareness is the first step. Wake up and become active. Low-energy electrolysis is a reality and will give us limitless energy for all applications once the technology becomes viral.

Google: Water-powered car, Stan Meyer, energy inventors murdred.

If you go around breaking the first and second laws of thermodynamics, you should expect the consequences.

neilmcl

Nilrem wrote: »

Ah a CT.

If you're referring to the OP I'm not sure you got your spelling correct.

bclark

They won’t let it happen until they can adequately tax it.

fred7777

Trevor2522 wrote: »

Water can and has been split into its constituent gases by using high alternating frequencies at low-current.

Google: Water-powered car, Stan Meyer, energy inventors murdred.

Water can be split into it's constituent gases using the same amount of energy or more than you would get from recombining it.

Google: Stan Meyer Fraud

jwruk

Top lurking by the OP, 2 years and a single post about a currently non-viable fuel.