We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Microsoft Office (excel) which version?
Comments
-
As for learning I would suggest 2007 and higher... It supports more rows and everything than 2003. Now about menu there is program which makes back classic menu so even experienced user can normally use... Google around about 2007vs2003 and decide.0
-
ChiefGrasscutter wrote: »Personally I find 2003 easier to use as an experienced user than 2007/10.
I know what I want to do and find that 2003 has the easiest/smallest number of keystrokes whatever to get to do it.
So for me anyway the ribbon interface is a major hinderance
it's a nightmare isn't it. I don't use them a lot but have to support them so when i'm trying to find something I don't use daily, i want to see it in writing and not a picture0 -
I have 2010 at work and 2007 at home. Agree with earlier poster who says little difference. The thing people cared most about was the "file" button not being called "file" anymore - this is changed back in 2010. Print preview is better in '10, and the addition of Sparklines is awesome - although pointless if you're sending to someone without 2010!
2003 default format for pivot tables is much better than '07/'10 - I get annoyed that every time I create one (which is daily) I have to change it to display in the old format!
Also 2003 shortcut keys still work in the new version.
I disagree with people complaining about the ribbon, when you get used to it it's fantastic - especially the way it adds extra tabs for formatting pivot tables, charts, pictures etc.
Also does depend how much data you'll be using, I regularly run into the hundreds of thousands, so 2003 is no use.
I would never suggest someone gets 2003 version now that it is 8 years old, as fantastic as it is everyone is sending .xlsx now so I would be getting 2007 as a minimum."We can all fly as high as the dreams we dare to live...........unless we are a chicken" ~ Anon.0 -
I disagree with people complaining about the ribbon, when you get used to it it's fantastic - especially the way it adds extra tabs for formatting pivot tables, charts, pictures etc.
.
but like you say 'when you get used to it'. It's a nightmare when you don't use the application that much for a working purpose but have to support 2000 / 2003 / 2007 and 2010 and end up clicking all over the place to find something.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards