We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Latest Zoopla price report
Comments
-
Zoopla has my house down as being worth 50% of what I nearly sold it for 4 years back. Seriously flawed0
-
longleggedhair wrote: »Is Graham_Devon always so argumentative? People come on these forums to share information and advice, if you dont like it click onto the next thread.
He has averaged 16 posts a day - for 6 years - that's not normal ....
Bringing Happiness where there is Gloom!0 -
Yeslongleggedhair wrote: »Is Graham_Devon always so argumentative?People come on these forums to share information and advice, if you dont like it click onto the next thread.
Hahaha0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »You appear to be disagreeing with yourself now?
I've never mentioned 3.5%. You did. You took issue to me posting the monetry value and suggested my maths was poor, simply because I quoted the part of an article you don't like, and now you are taking issue with the 3.5% YOU posted.
What's up fella?
Once again you use your preferred tactic of confusion and disinformation.
Hamish posted the link so everyone who was interested could see all the quote. Instead of commenting on the figures, you chose to make an unwarranted attack on how it was posted ~ as per usual.If I don't reply to your post,
you're probably on my ignore list.0 -
Once again you use your preferred tactic of confusion and disinformation.
Hamish posted the link so everyone who was interested could see all the quote. Instead of commenting on the figures, you chose to make an unwarranted attack on how it was posted ~ as per usual.
Well why didn't you say that in the first place, instead of sending yourself round in circles with your 3.5% faux pas?0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Well why didn't you say that in the first place, instead of sending yourself round in circles with your 3.5% faux pas?
It wasn't a faux pas, you misunderstood my post as you do so many others. You then blame the other poster for not explaining it to you in words a 5 year old could understand.If I don't reply to your post,
you're probably on my ignore list.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards