We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Bit of a dodgy landlord?

2»

Comments

  • I've just checked.., a HMO for which u need a HMO licence is when a landlord is renting out accommodation to at least five persons who form more than one household who share kitchen, bathroom, toilet. The OP's situation seems to correspond to that, so therefore he should have a HMO licence. U can quite easily contact your local council's Housing/private renting department. They will send an inspector round and he will find himself with requirements to be met according to what the OP says. In our case, they did not stand for any nonsense from the landlord.
  • red40
    red40 Posts: 264 Forumite
    edited 24 October 2011 at 6:47PM
    Benji wrote: »
    But this landlord doesn't have a valid licence and neither does he seem to have applied for a valid licence.

    The landlord does have a valid licence for the number of people/households he initially applied for. So his licence is valid for 6 households and 7 persons. However as he has now (presumably) knowingly permitted more occupants/households to occupy the property and therefore is subject only to the fines of £20,000 and/or £5,000, unfortunately not the rent repayment order.

    Page 26 & 27, paragraph 6.4 and 6.5 of the document below explains it further

    http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/housing/pdf/322460.pdf
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.