We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
House prices down 30-50%...why not rates?
Options

Parisien
Posts: 930 Forumite


Following on from a programme on BBC 4 today where GB homeowners are challenging older council tax bandings where they were wrongly banded for whatever reason, owners have been able to get rebates going back many years.
Can we do the same here given I assume the lower rateable valuation on our NI homes over the last 3 yrs?
If not should we bring a challenge to the whole system?
Can we do the same here given I assume the lower rateable valuation on our NI homes over the last 3 yrs?
If not should we bring a challenge to the whole system?
0
Comments
-
Parisien, unfortunately not. There is an overall total amount that needs to be paid in rates which is then divided up among households according to the capital value of homes. As the market value of all properties is down so the proportion of the total rates bill each household pays is the same regardless of the current valuation.0
-
Anyway the ratings valuation is based on values 4-5 years ago, mine is still a bit lower than the market value of the house!0
-
Following on from a programme on BBC 4 today where GB homeowners are challenging older council tax bandings where they were wrongly banded for whatever reason, owners have been able to get rebates going back many years.
Can we do the same here given I assume the lower rateable valuation on our NI homes over the last 3 yrs?
If not should we bring a challenge to the whole system?
Rates are calculated based on the house value in 2005 (i think!)
Therefore huge fluctiations UP that we saw in 2006 / 2007 and fluctuations down do not impact the rateable value.0 -
Yes valuations are based on values in January 2005, people with existing houses at the time in 2006/7 when it was brought in have been very luckily paying based on lower values. Anyone who has bought a new build has been screwed, myself included. If you ask for a reval they tell you the computer says no and refuse to change it.0
-
Thanks guys.....oh well there goes another money saving venture!0
-
If we want lower rates we have to ensure our councils spend less! Perhaps time for a reconsideration of what councils do?[STRIKE]Less is more.[/STRIKE] No less is Less.0
-
-
Ballymackeonan wrote: »Anyway the ratings valuation is based on values 4-5 years ago, mine is still a bit lower than the market value of the house!
I wouldn't be too sure...7 Feb 2012: 10st7lbs14 Feb: 10st4.5lbs
21 Feb: 10st4lbs * 1 March: 10st2.5lbs :j13 March: 10st3lbs (post-holiday)
30 March: 10st1.5lbs
4 April: 10st0.75lbs * 6 April: 9st13.5 lbs
27 April 9st12.5lbs * 16 May 9st12lbs * 11 June 9st11lbs * 15 June 9st9.5lbs * 20 June 9st8.5lbs
27 June 9st8lbs * 1 July 9st7lbs * 7 July 9st6.5lbs
0 -
-
It’s worth pointing out that some commentators (RICS, several estate agents and media commentators) suggest we are now at 2003 pricing levels and still falling (15%+ last year). For anyone getting RV set on a new build I would seriously be looking to challenge the valuation if you’re unhappy. I know people who have done exactly this. You can provide comparable to LPS. No point paying for ridiculous rates like some here have mentioned just so you can have a meaningless rateable value. 2005 is the point of reference. All properties on the list and indeed newly rated properties are based on their value in 2005.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards