We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Debit Card Fraud

13»

Comments

  • !!!!!! there is no magic to chip and pin it is just a means to pay just like the old system where you signed!
    Until OP comes back and confirms what he/she signed up for and what would happen if they did not pay what was owed and contracted to pay nobody on here can give any advice.
  • pqrdef wrote: »
    Sadly this applies to Direct Debits as well now, because they can claim to have continuous authority to reinstate DD mandates.
    Please tell us more about this new wheeze.
  • pqrdef
    pqrdef Posts: 4,552 Forumite
    Please tell us more about this new wheeze.
    You give a firm an authority to set up a Direct Debit. When you don't want to renew, you cancel the DD mandate at the bank end. But the firm says they have the right under their T&C to carry on taking payments, so they just set the DD up again.
    "It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis
  • meer53
    meer53 Posts: 10,217 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    pqrdef wrote: »
    You give a firm an authority to set up a Direct Debit. When you don't want to renew, you cancel the DD mandate at the bank end. But the firm says they have the right under their T&C to carry on taking payments, so they just set the DD up again.

    You've opened up a right can of worms now ! 2sides2everystory doesn't agree with Terms and Conditions. Prepare yourself !:eek:
  • pqrdef wrote: »
    But the firm says they have the right under their T&C to carry on taking payments, so they just set the DD up again.
    In order to be a "firm" authorised as an originator of direct debits then that "firm" must provide indemnity guaranties through their own bank.

    I fail to see how re-setting up a DD after the customer has already cancelled it will do the originator any good at all, other than to make a nuisance of themselves for their own bank and for the customer and his bank. All money debited via DDs will be refunded without question if the customer so instructs his bank.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.