We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
MW: IS buying cheaper than renting?
Comments
-
-
Excellent post from my point of view (yes, do forgive us teasing Geneer but we've grown rather fond of it. Geneer, for his part, likes to go back to the forum I used to frequent (until banned
) to tell people how badly I am doing. Hence I am never off of the front page over there)!
Thats funny. Could you be referring to the same thread you mentioned here?Geneer, lovin' that you posted this over on Cc showing a view count of 244. That would have made it the 10th most popular topic on their front page out of 25!
I see you had to reply to your own post to make the reply count next to nothing.
Bzzt. Does not compute.
Could it truly be that pimperne1 simply pumps out his mindless assertions with little regard to reality? :rotfl:
Can't see you on the front page by the way. They seek him there, they seek him there that damned elusive pimperne1.
0 -
RenovationMan wrote: »I don't understand why you guys care so much about each other? Are the home owners so insecure in their decision to buy that they need to justify it over multiple threads
Yeah. Who would so insecure as to do something like that?
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/3380496
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/3498145
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/3498173
Heh heh. Admit it repo. You fell into that one.0 -
Can't see you on the front page by the way. They seek him there, they seek him there that damned elusive pimperne1.
Herewith, second topic, sixth largest viewing, FRONT PAGE:
http://www.creditcrunch.co.uk/forum/topic/10348-where-are-they-now/
Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeers Pimpy? :T0 -
Sorry, but still can't see your name on the front page pimperdoodle.
Do make up your mind though, the thread is either doing fab, or I'm replying to myself. Can't be both. (you forgot to comment on this bit didn't you)
Firstly, its a different thread geneer. Here's the 244 view thread you posted over there (although you do put rather a lot of my good work over there so it must be confusing).
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/3504101
As for being "on the front page" - I did of course expect you to open up a thread to see my name. Incidentally, I fully expect the same thread to be "on the front page" this time next week with the traffic now passing through Cc. :beer:
Edit to say (and this will be very interesting for everyone on site -sorry apologies) - I appear on two other threads on the front page!0 -
Firstly, its a different thread geneer. Here's the 244 view thread you posted over there (although you do put rather a lot of my good work over there so it must be confusing).
"244 views.....244 views....i'm a very good driver".
Inevitabley the rainman cometh.
Cant help but notice that thats not a link to "over there".
As for being "on the front page" - I did of course expect you to open up a thread to see my name.
Which is another way of saying you are most certainly "off" the front page.
As opposed to say...Hence I am never off of the front page over there)!
bzttttt does not compute.
Another meaningless assertion blown out of the pimperhole.
Incidentally, I fully expect the same thread to be "on the front page" this time next week with the traffic now passing through Cc.
Incidentally, you're the only one who seems to care. :rotfl:
Keep checking in on old CC won't you Pimperne1.
Your bonkers view counting habits are fascinating.0 -
6 years on, higher house prices, still renting, and still you were right.... I give up. Good luck.0
-
heathcote123 wrote: »6 years on, higher house prices, still renting, and still you were right.... I give up. Good luck.
11 December 11. Might bring your Downfall parody up for the celebration.
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:0 -
heathcote123 wrote: »6 years on
and 4 years from the start of the Crash/meltdown.heathcote123 wrote: »higher house prices
If you ignore the crash.heathcote123 wrote: »still renting, and still you were right....
No one said the bears got it 100% right. This has been discussed multiple times. Its just more convenient for you to run with the fallacies in order to keep your meaningless circular arguments spinning.
Anyway, they weren't 100% right, but they were infinitely more accurate than chaps like yourself.heathcote123 wrote: »... I give up.
:rotfl:If only you had it in you Fubra. Maybe you should have given up 4 years ago. 0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards