We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
High Interest Savings or ISA
imation_2
Posts: 6 Forumite
Hi,
which is better in terms of interest gained. A regular saving account giving 7.07% or a cash isa giving 5.15%. These are both deals from the hailfax.
which is better in terms of interest gained. A regular saving account giving 7.07% or a cash isa giving 5.15%. These are both deals from the hailfax.
0
Comments
-
ISA because you wont get taxed
7/12*20 should give you what you will get after tax0 -
Doesnt the regular saver at 7.07% give an effective rate of 5.51% after tax at 22%. That is 7.07 * (1-0.22).0
-
or if you want a better rate go to HSBC you get 8% for a regular saver0
-
Ok, but the question is which is the better investment in terms of interest after tax.
The regular saver at 7.07% from Halifax or an ISA at 5.51%?0 -
Are you putting in a lump sum £3000 or £250 per month into the ISAJust for one moment, thought I'd found my way.0
-
Actually with savings I believe they only apply 20% tax (if you are a basic rate tax payer).
So: 7.07% * 0.8 = 5.66%
That means it is fractionally better than the ISA.
BUT, the ISA has far less conditions on it.0 -
The 7.07% will be taxed at 20% giving you a net rate of 5.66% which is higher than the 5.15% from the ISA. Remember, however, that you can only put £250 a month in to the regular saver so you only get the full 5.66% on the first £250, 11/12 of that on the next £250 and so on.
For a comparison, £3000 lump sum in the ISA for 12 months would grow to £3158 after 12 months whereas £250 a month into the regular saver would only be £3079 after 12 months.
In other words, the regular saver accounts are good, and are certainly the first thing to go for once you've used your ISA allowances and can "drip feed" them from another savings account (to maximise overall interest earned) but they're not the get rich quick scheme the marketing would suggest
0 -
fairenoughclough wrote:Are you putting in a lump sum £3000 or £250 per month into the ISA
I intend putting in a regular sum...say £200 per month.0 -
Remember however, that an ISA allowance will lapse when the end of the financial year is up, and that will mean you lose a perpetuity of tax-free income for good. You need to tag a value to this, when you make a comparison.It's always the grass that suffers, irrespective of whether the elephants are fighting or making love !!!0
-
Walletwatch wrote:Remember however, that an ISA allowance will lapse when the end of the financial year is up, and that will mean you lose a perpetuity of tax-free income for good. You need to tag a value to this, when you make a comparison.
Unless of course some politicians change the rules !
In pure monetary terms the ISA represents the worst return over the guaranteed period, if however you are looking at long term savings then under the current rules it looks like a potentially safer bet.
However if it for the short term, take the money and run.Just for one moment, thought I'd found my way.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
