We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
IVA: Why need 2 creditors with 3 lines of credit?

The_Swerve
Posts: 78 Forumite

in IVA & DRO
Hello,
Just a quick question...why is a part of the criteria for an IVA that you need 2 creditors with 3 lines of credit...why cant you just have 2 creditors (with just the 2 lines of credit)?
I cannot think of a good reason!!!!!
Ta
have a good weekend
Just a quick question...why is a part of the criteria for an IVA that you need 2 creditors with 3 lines of credit...why cant you just have 2 creditors (with just the 2 lines of credit)?
I cannot think of a good reason!!!!!
Ta
have a good weekend
0
Comments
-
i dont know if this is the reason, but as a stab in the dark, it may have something to do with the 75% ruling to approve an iva, as in you need 75% of your creditors to vote yes for your iva to be accepted, so for instance you only had 2 lines of credit, if 1 said no, and the other said yes, then that would be 50:50, so you would need 3 lines of credit, then if 2 said yes, and 1 said no, that would be the 75% needed to get your iva accepted.
I am probably way of the mark, but it is the only logical thing i can think offTake every day as it comes!!0 -
i dont know if this is the reason, but as a stab in the dark, it may have something to do with the 75% ruling to approve an iva, as in you need 75% of your creditors to vote yes for your iva to be accepted, so for instance you only had 2 lines of credit, if 1 said no, and the other said yes, then that would be 50:50, so you would need 3 lines of credit, then if 2 said yes, and 1 said no, that would be the 75% needed to get your iva accepted.
I am probably way of the mark, but it is the only logical thing i can think off
No. That would be 66.6%.
4 lines would meet that criteria, so it must be some other reason.0 -
It's British Law --- no rhyme nor reason !!!!0
-
It is 75% by value not by number of creditors, it matters how much is owed to the creditors.0
-
like i said, it was a stab in the darkTake every day as it comes!!0
-
Thank you for you replies.
I have done some further reasearch on the matter. Apparently, in theory, you can do an IVA with just one creditor, its just that one creditor would have 100% of the vote. I guess it would come down to whether it would be worth doing for just one creditor, especially with a lower debt level..
Cheers0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards