Judge Ackroyd 2008 Oldham court

HO87

Or far more useful:

Observices Parking Consultancy Ltd v Thurlow [2011] - an appeal case where the judge ruled:

• the charge amounted to an unenforceable penalty
• there was no loss suffered as a result of any alleged breach
• the common discount period reinforced the lack of provable loss
• Arthur v Anker [1997] and Vine v LB Waltham Forest [2000] deemed irrelevant to ticketing cases.

or perhaps, Excel Parking Services v Cutts [2011] - where the judge ruled:

• the signage was too small
• wording failed to make the terms clear
• it was clear the emphasis was on catching motorists not on managing the car park

or the succession of victories over Aintree NHS Trust

Coupon-mad

Or the Hetherington-Jakeman case:

http://www.tpuc.org/node/231

Or the case where a trainee solicitor took Parking Eye to Court and got a refund after they had just been paid by a dumb Car Hire company. I am not sure why she didn't take the Hire Co to Court but good on Tasneem Patel, who did post about it on this MSE forum a couple of years ago.

Surely the latter is a much more relevant case along with the Smith case, for Parking Eye to point to...but then they don't want people to know do they?!




Do not ignore a private parking ticket - from 2013 onwards things changed in England/Wales. If yours is Parking Eye then they are suing people and so are some other PPCs.

You must appeal and with current forum advice, you will win at popla - we win 100% of appeals in 2014.

Please click to page one of the forum, get off this old thread. See my signature below for where to click to read current advice. Please read the NEWBIES thread at the top of this very forum.

Did I say STOP reading this ancient thread, NOW??!!

give_them_FA

Good ol' Parking Eye, eh? More full of you-know-what than a blocked toilet...