We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
BACS limit
Options

pjaj
Posts: 119 Forumite


Recently both NatWest and Nation Wide have refused to perform an in-branch BACS transfer for sums over £10,000 and insisted on using CHAPS (for which they charge, of course) even though there was no great urgency, 3 working days would have done in both cases.
Why is this? Are they just trying it on, or is there some good legal reason?
The first was to pass a house deposit to the solicitor, the second to consolidate funds in one account ready for the completion.
Why is this? Are they just trying it on, or is there some good legal reason?
The first was to pass a house deposit to the solicitor, the second to consolidate funds in one account ready for the completion.
Sent from my abacus.
0
Comments
-
Natwest & RBS systems in branch are Branch Single Payment systems. These use the Faster Payment system to send payments, not BACs.
So in order for the payment to go across:
a) The payment going across must be £10,000 or less
b) The beneficiary account must be able to accept Faster Payments
There is no "legal" reason why Natwest couldn't do it, and it is not a system limitation either - the system is working as intended.Anything that I do say, is strictly my opinion
0 -
OK thanks. Is there any other way, apart from a cheque, of transferring sums in excess of £10,000 without incurring charges like CHAPS?
This assumes that 3-4 working days would be acceptable if necessary.Sent from my abacus.0 -
Yes it is called a cheque.
Or do 2 transactions of say £5000 today and tomorrow.0 -
-
Use a cheque or do transactions of £10,000 a day via telephone or Internet until the amount you want is transferred.
Larger payments are more work for the bank and greater risk for all concerned if they go wrong or are fraudulent. Even without that, banks are entitled to charge for services they provide. Most payments are sent free of any charge.urs sinserly,
~~joosy jeezus~~0 -
Most solicitors won't accept a cheque, though. And to send funds by cheque will take longer than 3 days unless the cheque is hand delivered to the recipient.0
-
Set up a monthly standing order for the full amount and then cancel it a day or so after the first payment is sent. Standing orders go by FPS or BACS (depending on the amount), not by CHAPS.0
-
There is a limit on standing orders, so this wouldn't be possible - the customer also runs the risk of forgetting about the standing order. Not saying they will, but we're all human :P
You can send up to £20,000 via BACS using online banking.
In a nutshell:
If the payment is £10,000 or less, and can go via FP, it will.
If it is more than £10,000, yet lower than £20,000 , it will go via BACS, regardless of whether the receiving account is FP enabled or not.Anything that I do say, is strictly my opinion
0 -
There is a limit on standing orders, so this wouldn't be possible - the customer also runs the risk of forgetting about the standing order. Not saying they will, but we're all human0
-
Yes, the limit is £100k for standing orders via FPS.
The article also talks of £20K FP limits (in general), but LTSB is currently £25K.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards