We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Private Car Parking charges/companies.

2»

Comments

  • Hadeon wrote: »
    Just wondering how receptive/agreeable insurance companies are/would be to this strategy should private individual owners of motor vehicles avail themselves of this service.

    It should not make any difference. When applying for insurance you have to state where the car is kept, not the address on the logbook.
  • Hadeon
    Hadeon Posts: 367 Forumite
    edited 12 September 2011 at 5:06AM
    HO87 wrote: »
    Why? There is a cost involved but it costs us nothing to ignore PPC's, and DCA's. I am not Scottish, for the record.

    I'm a little confused.com at your response to my post.
    Did you in fact intend it as a response to oldone's post at #8 ?
    Nevertheless, I happen to agree with you - why indeed would someone pay, or even consider paying, good money to a third-party to ignore something which can be perfectly-well ignored by themselves at zero cost.
    Furthermore, the fees payable to the third-party would probably exceed the unenforceable initial demands of the PPC/DCA in any event, so what's the point?
    Also somewhat puzzled by your final comment, but for the record & FWIW, I am not Scottish either.;)
  • Hadeon
    Hadeon Posts: 367 Forumite
    oldone wrote: »
    It should not make any difference. When applying for insurance you have to state where the car is kept, not the address on the logbook.

    Agreed - particularly insofar as this relates to the usual scenarios of a registered keeper (who is also the owner/user) applying for insurance, or a company owned vehicle (whether or not registered to that company) allocated to an employee(s) for his/their use.

    However, the companies referred to in your post are clearly not the owners or users and have no propritetary right or interest in the vehicles whatsoever.

    The purpose behind my earlier post was to sound a cautionary note as such an arrangement may well invalidate an existing policy if the insurance company are not notified of the change. The insurance company may also not agree to continue providing cover under such circumstances, or to issue a new policy.

    About 3 years ago, in my capacity as a private individual, I informally conferred ownership of a car as a gift to an immediate relative (not resident with me), but I wished to remain the registered keeper.
    However, when applying for insurance, the insurance company concerned were not prepared to issue a policy to the relative under circumstances where they were not the registered keeper.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.