Energy Price Cap announcement: Watch Martin Lewis explain what it means for your electricity and gas bills this winter
MSE News: OFT to investigate rising car insurance costs

2.4K Posts
This is the discussion thread for the following MSE News Story:
"The Office of Fair Trading is to probe the private car insurance industry, after reports of rising premiums ..."
"The Office of Fair Trading is to probe the private car insurance industry, after reports of rising premiums ..."
0
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides
Replies
The answer is to put a stop to the practice by banning referral payments and/or limit the fees personal injury lawyers can charge to make it less profitable for them.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/insurance/motorinsurance/8615501/Dirty-secret-of-car-insurers-selling-accident-victims-details-to-no-win-no-fee-lawyers.html
Not enough. Car insurance in general is loss making. It needs add on products and other areas to make it profitable.
By add-ons, I assume you're not counting the £1000 referral fees, from the hire companies, the solicitors, and the claim management companies?
I went on all the comparison websites and on MSE and on forums, etc - I spent a good couple hours looking about. I eventually got a quote for £75 per month (ten month policy) with £0 excess, which was obviously £14 less than I was already paying a month AND £40 (£400 a year!!!!!) less than my renewal.
I called Elephant.co.uk to tell them and they said great, off you go - but before you do tell us who that's with please. So I did, Admiral, and they said, well that's part of our group so we can just match that and you can stay with us!?!?!? I mean !!!!!!?!?!?!
If they could 'just match it' why not offer it in the first place?! It's all one big rip off con. It's nothing to do with accidents, young drivers and so on, it's all to do with greedy insurers (like greedy bankers) squeezing every penny out of this poor unsuspecting society.
I disagree. I don't think they should be making any money from people's apathy.
If you want to argue the increase in premiums is valid then that's a fair point. [I'm not convinced that I agree, but I understand.]
If you want to argue that personal injury claims should be clamped down on then fair enough.
But to argue they should be making more money from people's apathy is, in my book, just plain wrong.
I did some searching only to find £525 was fairly cheap most quotes were over £600 and I even got one from a well know insurer of £910.
I suggest you keep searching though as I did finally manage to get a more realistic price of £425 this was still an increase on last year though.
I think that's the main problem.
Insurers are now happy to haggle, so you know the pricing structure allows for it, and they are happy with the lower premium they will eventually agree on.
To select one small part of the business model to claim they don't make profits on is unrealistic.
And the losses are paper losses, due to moving money around inside the company.
But again, I've posted enough examples where insurers even make a profit on paper.
I think the best guide is to look at the bonuses, and the payment to shareholders for indication they're not going to go bankrupt tomorrow.
I hope you still moved, even if it was within the same company.
DS had a similar experience with Elephant, also had 1 year ncb from a 10 month policy, was offered a 10% reduction in premium but price comparison for elephant came up with a 30% reduction which they then matched on the phone.
Certainly they are trading on apathy but I don't see that as a problem - after all do we object when Sainsbury's or Tesco are 50p more on some products than Asda or Morrison's depending on what promotions are running or just understand that to get the keenest prices it is necessary to shop around?