We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Q
Comments
-
longforgotten wrote: »So the deal is make a new family happy by, maybe, ruining someone else's life. He could end up in an area he does not want to live in, knows nobody............ He is not a young person
I still think its unfair. It's like a game of a pass the parcel and he's the parcel ! All for the good of someone else.
Would you be able to take him in? Or one of the other people worried about where he's going to go?0 -
Would you be able to take him in? Or one of the other people worried about where he's going to go?
I'm new to the village and I admit I do not know the guy.
I also admit I didn't realise that a council house should not be considered a home for life, and you can just be moved if told to do so.
Now I come to think of it I had an uncle who lived in a council house for many years on his own after his four children had moved out and his wife died. He would have lived in that house maybe fourty years before he died, spending the last seven years on his own.
Times have changed.0 -
I was hoping there was some way to help the guy keep what he must consider his home.
It just seems a terrible shame.
Thank you for all the replies.0 -
i don't think times have changed, its just the circumstances are slightly different - according to the rules the tenancy can transfer once after a death, after a second death, it is up to the council:
So the tenancy was probably between the parents, one died and it passed to the other. Now the remaining parent has died it doesn't pass again to the son.What happens to a tenancy when someone dies
If you live together, you may be able to pass on your tenancy to:
* your spouse (husband or wife)
* your registered civil partner
* a close family member – as long as they lived with you continuously for 12 months or more before you died
Passing on the tenancy like this is called 'succession'.
A tenancy can only be passed on once. If you took over your tenancy through succession, no one would have the right to succession when you die. Your council may give the person a new tenancy so they can continue to live at the property. The council may offer the person another property.
I'm pretty sure the government wants to change the rules for new tenants that means that a council can rehouse people sooner - as demand requires. There is a housing shortage and councils need to be able to house new tenants. Sadly this is how it is. The council shouldn't just kick him out, they should rehouse him first.0 -
on the plus side he'll only need to find the rent for a one bed flat now instead of paying over the odds for a larger house - if he's on HB he won't get rent paid for over his entitlement.Debt free 4th April 2007.
New house. Bigger mortgage. MFWB after I have my buffer cash in place.0 -
i don't think times have changed, its just the circumstances are slightly different - according to the rules the tenancy can transfer once after a death, after a second death, it is up to the council:
So the tenancy was probably between the parents, one died and it passed to the other. Now the remaining parent has died it doesn't pass again to the son.
I'm pretty sure the government wants to change the rules for new tenants that means that a council can rehouse people sooner - as demand requires. There is a housing shortage and councils need to be able to house new tenants. Sadly this is how it is. The council shouldn't just kick him out, they should rehouse him first.
I agree with this. I am afraid my brother will suffer the same fate when my parents pass away. He has had a few health issues over the years, and found it difficult to work long-term and afford a place of his own. He even lived in a caravan for a while, but that got broken into so he came home again. M&D have a HA property, currently in their joint names - when one goes, the succession rules state only one change of tenant, so the other will inherit the tenancy, then my brother will eventually need to move when the other finally goes.
I also agree that the council cannot simply throw anyone out on the street, but I think although there is a duty to rehome, there is often little choice of where or what type of property they will be offered. It could be in a totally different location, or being a single person, even a flat. I also seem to remember there being a clause that they will offer only 3 alternative properties, and if these are all refused, then the tenant has made themselves homeless, although I may have imagined this!0 -
Does the succession have to pass to the spouse.
Perhaps once one parent dies it would be best to pass succession on to 'a close family member', in this case son, if their intention is not to move out.
At least, after looking after both parents because of their ill health, this chap would have the choice of staying at his home once his remaining parent passed away.
I wonder if the council give advice on 'succession' .............0 -
Also must apologise that my thread only says 'Q'
I had intended for it to read 'Can the Council make you move' but obviously I boobed and managed 'Q' instead.
0 -
longforgotten wrote: »Does the succession have to pass to the spouse.
Perhaps once one parent dies it would be best to pass succession on to 'a close family member', in this case son, if their intention is not to move out.
At least, after looking after both parents because of their ill health, this chap would have the choice of staying at his home once his remaining parent passed away.
I wonder if the council give advice on 'succession' .............
What would happen though if the son had died before the wife?0 -
Is there no one within this loving sharing village who wants a lodger?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards