We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
If you're not worried about what's going on....
Comments
-
Well the US government is now suing the banks, including BoA. So they must feel that the banks can totally afford this and the markets are nowhere near a total crisis of confidence, mustn't they.
I heard on the news it was more to do with the statute of limitations then any feeling that the banks can afford these lawsuits. If they had not given them notice now that they were being sued, then time would have run out on bringing any lawsuit and it could not have proceeded in the future.
I don't believe this is going to do anything to increase confidence. The markets should be interesting next week.[FONT="]“I've learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.” ~ Maya Angelou[/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]0 -
I think Macque has the right idea going to work in Asia for a few years.
The world is changing and the culture of entitlement without responsibility or the inclination to work is pretty pervasive in the UK. Welfare commitments continue to rise.
I don't see anyone bold enough to make any wholesale changes.0 -
Shakethedisease wrote: »Didn't a lot of really rich people do that before the Wall St crash to try and bolster confidence ?? Is it not a known confidence trick in the markets ?"It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis0
-
I think it is easy to be too pessimistic. These problems are not unique. They have happened before. This can give us great hope, since if our fathers and grandfathers could solve them, so can we.
The generation of 50 or 60 years ago had more in common with our Viking and Norman ancestors than us today. The world is a totally different place in so many ways.
The question I would pose is do people want to solve them? Or will the £10 donation to Comic Relief clear their conscious whilst still holidaying in the Caribbean.
Without a fundamental change of attitude there's a long road ahead.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »The generation of 50 or 60 years ago had more in common with our Viking and Norman ancestors than us today. The world is a totally different place in so many ways.
The question I would pose is do people want to solve them? Or will the £10 donation to Comic Relief clear their conscious whilst still holidaying in the Caribbean.
Without a fundamental change of attitude there's a long road ahead.
That is what we need, but there is no one around it seems in any political party of any country who is radical enough to start thinking out of the box and help show the way.[FONT="]“I've learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.” ~ Maya Angelou[/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »The generation of 50 or 60 years ago had more in common with our Viking and Norman ancestors than us today. The world is a totally different place in so many ways.
Without a fundamental change of attitude there's a long road ahead.
The world is indeed a totally different place, but surely that is precisely because there has already been a fundamental change of attitude to many things in life - the rise in materialism, consumerism and debt just happens to be a straw that finally broke one of the camels' backs - there are quite a few more camels under considerable strain!
What we need is another change in attitude - my priority would be knock the banks off their perch of invincibility, and whilst I was engineering such a massive change, I would make it compulsory for society's new movers and shakers to quit the talking, and start the action, whatever the cost, to avert the disastrous effects of climate change. The negative effects of any government's 'austerity package' are likely to seem insignificant in the face of serious global warming
I guess everbody will have their own ideas about what they would do first...
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
-
That is what we need, but there is no one around it seems in any political party of any country who is radical enough to start thinking out of the box and help show the way.
To a politician telling people the truth is paramount to committing career suicide. Easier for the new to break first in the media........0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »To a politician telling people the truth is paramount to committing career suicide. Easier for the news to break first in the media........
That's ok to some extent, if it's the politician leading behind the news but we seem to have got in the sorry state where it's the news that leads the politicians. I'm struggling to think of a single politician now that has any strong convictions on anything or gives any impression of being trustworthy or even that they have any original thoughts on a direction for this country.[FONT="]“I've learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.” ~ Maya Angelou[/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]0 -
I'll just leave this here then
I wouldnt have thought Generalli was a doomerSeriously though as well as people being completely unaware its also possible to overreact and be too negative
Its just about possible that when bad debts do completely unwind its a positive event for those who are productive, companies or people even.
Its a dim light at the end of the tunnel. Eventually it should be that less gravitas is seen with those who borrow and overspend, especially government schemes and the sort I hope. The other end should be more creative elements are valued higher and less restricted?
The negative view would be a downward spiral, reactionist government measures to seize and control & debt. Ending up something like communist revolution, thats not my view personally
I keep hearing how the German people wont allow a repeat or a change to their laws to favour debt and weakened currency.
Maybe they will be first to break the cycle and cause the next leg in events0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards