We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
At what point does a house reach the end of its life?
Options
Comments
-
Hmm, I'd like to see the state of some of the 'starter homes' that popped up from the 90s onwards in over 100 years time.
Houses need to be maintained, simple as that. It's a crying shame looking at some of the houses around here earmarked for tearing down due to 'regeneration'. That means putting 4 properties where there were 2, get your money's worth developers.0 -
Didn't John Prescott once conceive of a scheme where these sorts of areas were going to be forcibly demolished and replaced with something shiny and new and lovely. But the scheme foundered when the powers-that-be realised that some of the people "trapped" in these areas were actually living there quite happily and were quite peturbed at some whitehall politicians telling them they must have a new house because obviously no one would want to live in a hole like that.0
-
Oh I don't know..I bought a three storey terrace in the mid-eighties that was built in the 1880's. It had a slate roof, red brick throughout and not a thin partition wall or dodgy floor tile anywhere.
The walls were really thick and after installing a damp proof course, it was as cosy as could be.
If a house is lived in and looked after, it can go on forever. What happens I think is that we get bored of the place or tired of the 'same old/same old', and want to move on - there's a bit of the nomad in most of us I think and its a gradual sense of dissatisfaction that builds up over time to motivate us to move to somewhere bigger/better/nicer/newer.
At the end of the day, a house is (or should be) a home. A personal sanctuary that reflects our place in the world back to us. Sometimes we don't like what we see in that reflection and so we want to move on.
There are others of course who couldn't bear the thought of moving away from a home that they've been in for 20, 30, 40, 50, odd years
and I quite envy them for finding their 'happy place'.
Think I'm still working on mine.0 -
The type of house the OP is describing would have been built as cheaply as possible. Apart from Saltaire, Port Sunlight and Bournville most houses built to accommodate miners, mill and factory workers were built by uncaring bosses, so standards were poor. Many were cleared in the 1960s/70s and replaced by highrise flats.If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales0
-
Odd, then, that almost everyone wants a house and not a flat!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards