We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Where to start with pensions
Comments
-
The "inc" version of an income fund will distribute the dividend payment to you, normally on a quartely basis.The "acc" (for accumulation) version of the fund will reinvest the dividends in the fund.
They wont inside of a pension.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
I've scrapped the idea of a pension and am simply thinking of making monthly contributions to a fund of some sort or ideally several funds. Im getting a bit confused now because there are so many options. I don't know whether to go with Investment Trust, OEIC, Unit Trust etc. I unsure of which sector or fund to go with as there are so many.
I certainly wouldn't like to receive income on a quaterly basis, I would like everything reinvested as I am looking at this being a 5 to 10 year investment.0 -
I would suggest you go and open a mini S&S Isa.
If you intend to invest in only one fund, you could do a lot worse than this one which has a very long track record of excellent performance.Trying to keep it simple...
0 -
If you intend to invest in only one fund, then you should be prepared for lower investment returns over the long term. Single fund investing is old hat.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
-
I agree it's not optimal, but people have to start somewhere, and mattih5 won't be the first to be baffled by the choice out there.Once he gets started he will understand the system better and can start looking around at possible other choices to broaden his range.Trying to keep it simple...
0 -
So, you think its better to start out wrong and get round to fixing it later (which may or may not happen. Usually doesnt)?
If you are going to do it, do it right or get someone to do it right for you.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
So, you think its better to start out wrong and get round to fixing it later
It's not "wrong" to invest in only one fund - as long as it's a good one. It's less risky to diversify over a few.But again if they are !!!!!! non-performers, it's no help.If you are going to do it, do it right or get someone to do it right for you.
Paying someone else to do it is no guarantee of getting it right. IMHo there's no subsitute for doing your own research.Trying to keep it simple...
0 -
dunstonh wrote:If you intend to invest in only one fund, then you should be prepared for lower investment returns over the long term. Single fund investing is old hat.
f an individual is baffled by choice and unable to make a decsion then it is best put in the hands of someone else. Either use an IFA choose a suitable managed fund, or better still a Manager of Managers/multimanager fund that fits your risk profile.0 -
Frankly David, I'd say that's terribly advice.
Why waste money on an advisor who's going to choose a bog standard managed fund - anyone can do that by themselves.
And those multi manager funds are often just an excuse for an extra layer of charges on top of the ones you are already paying for each fund.Trying to keep it simple...
0 -
A fund of funds would be a good option for a lazy investor. It doesnt matter if it costs a fraction more because the investment potential over the long term is better than a single fund solution.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards