We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Court judgement

3.6Kwh PV System, Lg Panels , Growatt Inverter South Facing, 23 deg Roof Facing, Stoke on Trent

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,294 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    its a link to a website. What about it?
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Premier_2
    Premier_2 Posts: 15,141 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I think the OP is referring to this case:

    http://online.lightfoots.co.uk/downloads/consumer_credit/published/001-0032%20Time's%20up%20for%20some.pdf

    Common sense really. If a customer was given the information that optional PPI was being applied and that he could reject this or cancel it, and failed to act - then where is there a basis for a claim?
    "Now to trolling as a concept. .... Personally, I've always found it a little sad that people choose to spend such a large proportion of their lives in this way but they do, and we have to deal with it." - MSE Forum Manager 6th July 2010
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,294 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    If that is the case being referred to then it is no surprise. The courts enforce timebars but the FSA regulated complaints process does not (apart from specific areas which are brought in to stop abuse).

    So, if you go to court with the complaint, you should expect the laws of the land to apply.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • magpiecottage
    magpiecottage Posts: 9,241 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    dunstonh wrote: »
    If that is the case being referred to then it is no surprise. The courts enforce timebars but the FSA regulated complaints process does not (apart from specific areas which are brought in to stop abuse).

    So, if you go to court with the complaint, you should expect the laws of the land to apply.

    And Hollyoak cannot now take the case to FOS as Lloyds TSB can object on the grounds that the court has already dismissed it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.