We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
July's UK borrowing figures
Comments
-
heathcote123 wrote: »Thats nonsense. A business can put someone on statuatory sick pay or more likely fire them.
Only if they treat cancer patients the same way. Whether it's physical or mental illnesses is irrelevant if both have sick notes. Otherwise they risk legal trouble for discrimination. Business managers are not qualified to assess the severity of people's medical conditions and dispute the opinions of medical professionals.
Again, the problem lies with those doctors who so casually hand-out sick notes.0 -
Degenerate wrote: »Only if they treat cancer patients the same way. Whether it's physical or mental illnesses is irrelevant if both have sick notes. Otherwise they risk legal trouble for discrimination. Business managers are not qualified to assess the severity of people's medical conditions and dispute the opinions of medical professionals.
Again, the problem lies with those doctors who so casually hand-out sick notes.
I think that the problem lies with the people that abuse the system.
In the UK a few decades back a political decision was made that people that can't work should have the financial burden bourne by the whole of society, not just their family or themselves. The cost to individuals that couldn't find work or simply couldn't work was high.
Now there seem to be some people who want to milk that system. Instead of feel grateful to people that have kept them out of penuary there are some that want to take all the kindness and more because they feel entitled.
If someone lies to their Doctor to defraud the taxpaying majority, it's hardly the doctor's fault!0 -
Statutory poor relief goes back to the time of Elizabeth I. Where we are now, we've been before, notably when the enclosures reduced the demand for agricultural labour.In the UK a few decades back a political decision was made
This has a depressingly familiar ring
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speenhamland_system
The 19th-century crisis led inexorably to the workhouse, and the logic of the right is leading inexorably back to the same place. We just have to figure out how to make workhouses pay."It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards