PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Can any legal experts offer me any advice re EA contract....?

18910111214»

Comments

  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,313 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    They sent me an invoice with the 50% fee saying it was the new, final reduced fee (or words to that effect - hubby has it at work with him atm). It was only withdrawn VERBALLY by tha idiot iin our meeting. Even in his subsequent letter summarising our meeting he admits that the other partner had made the unconditional offer for me to settle and that he'd let that partner have the final say.

    Well, you could argue that the offer to settle for 50% was still open. It just seems silly to have left this open. All you needed was to write to them beforehand to say that you were prepared to offer 50%.
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • I don't want to sound negative but I don't agree that the estate agents haven't got a case due to the time elapsed since termination, from the extract of the contract you posted there seem to be two pertinent parts;



    I read this part as saying that fees are payable if you sell to anyone that has been introduced while the contract was in force.



    This clause merely states that within 6 months of termination the full fee is payable, as nothing is specified for the amount of fee payable after 6 months this must be open to negotiation.

    There is perhaps some argument over the precise meaning of the term purchaser, one could base a defence on Foxton's vs Bicknell where there was no intention to purchase on initial introduction however in this case it seems that an offer was made by the eventual purchaser during the period of the contract so arguably he was prepared to purchase, it was just that the negotiations took some time.

    I would follow GDB2222's suggestion of initiating a complaint with a very low offer to settle (I would probably start at 5% initially) but be prepared to negotiate.


    Following on from this I guess:

    The one thing they can't dispute, is that outside of the 6 months the 'full' fee wouldn't apply.

    However, as you've paid part of the fee, what may be disputable is the percentage of the full fee. As it's only a short time after 6 months, they may say 90% is fair, I'm no expert though. Depends how much they're after, clearly to me if they ask for full it'd get thrown out?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.