We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Is there a duty to advise a grossly unsuitable tarrif?

barfield
barfield Posts: 3 Newbie
edited 10 August 2011 at 4:26PM in Phones & TV
I have not been well and over the last three years have made thousands of calls to various helplines incurring enormous bills in
the mistaken belief that we had daytime free calls not just evenings
and weekends.
Two questions, should TalkTalk have alerted me to being on the wrong tariff? and should my solicitor who is handling my affairs at the moment have checked my direct debits and queried the bills.

More in hope than expectation..........Barfield.

Comments

  • macman
    macman Posts: 53,129 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    But how were TT to know you were on the 'wrong' tariff? A computer generated your bills, they're not read by humans to check if you are making lots of exclusive calls. It's not their job to pick your tariff.
    I appreciate that you have not been well, but you would only have had to check one single bill in 3 years to see that you were paying for daytime calls.
    No free lunch, and no free laptop ;)
  • TalkTalk have no duty toward this as they have offered you a variety of calling plans. If your agreement with your solicitor was such that he was supposed to check every single bill of yours, you could have an argument with him but that's about it I'm afraid.
  • Thank you both. Regarding the solicitor, I agree that checking all bills is not reasonable but checking one direct debit out of thirty six
    would have been nice !
  • moonrakerz
    moonrakerz Posts: 8,650 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    barfield wrote: »
    Thank you both. Regarding the solicitor, I agree that checking all bills is not reasonable but checking one direct debit out of thirty six
    would have been nice !

    Perhaps he checked the other 35 ?
  • macman
    macman Posts: 53,129 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Checking the DD's would not have told him anything, other than that you spent a lot of money on the phone. If you took out the original contract, how could it be his job to change it?
    He's a solicitor, not a lifestyle consultant.
    Did you also expect him to query your house insurance to ensure that you weren't paying too much?
    No free lunch, and no free laptop ;)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.