OPC Lose in Court.....Again

Sir_Roger_deLodger

trisontana wrote: »

On a final note, transcripts from Combined Parking Solutions were submitted by OPC and dismissed.

Are you reading this Perky? Any comments?

bromsgrovebarry

Oh please Perky, you have repeatedly told us about the Thomas case being a 'landmark ruling'. And you have the audacity to call us 'wannabe lawyers'.

trisontana

bromsgrovebarry wrote: »

Oh please Perky, you have repeatedly told us about the Thomas case being a 'landmark ruling'. And you have the audacity to call us 'wannabe lawyers'.

As apposed to Perky, who's a wannabe Romeo.

bromsgrovebarry

But our little rotund friend denied being Looplotty, the babe magnet of the West Midlands. Perhaps it is time to threaten Perky with a Norwich pharmacal order to find out who was in charge of the web page at the time of posting!

Driver8

trisontana wrote: »

As apposed to Perky, who's a wannabe Romeo.

He can't even do that right either...............ahahahahahahahahahaha

What a total mug he is.

Sirdan

The judge decided that the signage was not sufficient, both on there being no signage at the boundary between the two car parks, and secondly, that the principle signs where not clear in making it clear that this was not part of the pay and display car park.

Treading on very thin ice then OPC ,as I recall signage was one of the reasons they ended up prosecuted and found guilty previously.

AlexisV

In almost every case they have a small, crudely illustrated map and an essay of small text, often 10 feet up in the air.