We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
house sale equity split - what counts as contributions?

randomlife
Posts: 20 Forumite
Can anyone clarify what can be claimed for under property contributions when deciding share of equity amount when a property is sold? (Joint tenancy - one co-owner is claiming more than 50% and forcing other co-owner to agree to an agreed sum that is purely contribution based).
Which of these can be legally claimed for as contributions?
Mortgage payments
Deposit
Rates
Electricity
Heating
TV license
Phone - line rental
House Insurance
Furniture/appliances
Would paying for all food bills and giving the co-owner a car count as contribution under the argument that it was support of co-owner but at an economic disadvantage to you?
Any advice/comments appreciated.
Which of these can be legally claimed for as contributions?
Mortgage payments
Deposit
Rates
Electricity
Heating
TV license
Phone - line rental
House Insurance
Furniture/appliances
Would paying for all food bills and giving the co-owner a car count as contribution under the argument that it was support of co-owner but at an economic disadvantage to you?
Any advice/comments appreciated.
0
Comments
-
Were they as a couple?0
-
What did the initial agreement say?
To do this properly you have to convert money into equity at thetime of input which is hard if you start to try and count running costs because these should not count.
The starting point is purchase this is relatively easy.
You add up the total costs of purchase and split into 3
2 inputs(deposits costs etc) and the loan.
you then look at how you service the loan and split based on that.
that gives you your starting equity.
eg £100k house with 6k costs
one puts in £5k the other 10k you split the costs and the mortgage 50:50
ownership is in the ratio 50.5:55.5
Selling you do the reverse net proceeds after costs is split at the same ratio.
THEN you pay of the mortgage from you shares in the mortgage % in this case 50:50.
THis is the important bit split the procceeds BEFORE the mortgage is paid off.
It gets complicated if there have been any capital investment to the asset, so things like new/replacemnt fixtures decorating etc need to be done on equity split at the time they are costed in.
Most people make the mistake of money in == money out then split the proceeds.
Most of the other things are not relevent to the capital asset so need to be considered seperately as if you had rented, otherwise you need to include all spending so food holidays pub etc.0 -
Not couple - parent and child.0
-
Agreement was simply joint tenancy with verbal agreement of 50/50 split regardless of input. Goalposts have now changed as parent is forcing a sale and using right to buy discount as bargaining tool to gain higher than 50%. I have outlined the circumstances under Mortgages section for further input. Nightmare complicated disheartening familial situation....0
-
That's easy, then, if it's a family dispute there's no reasoning with them. They each get lawyers, then pay any equity in the property to them.
Or they act like adults and sort something reasonable out. When they start to get petty about who paid the TV licence, it's just plain daft, and they deserve the purgatory that they put themselves through.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
In terms of property ownership, I'd say anything that you'd pay if you were renting, e.g. utilities, TV licence, contents insurance, don't form part of the contribution to owning the house. Costs that you wouldn't incur in renting, e.g. mortgage, buildings insurance, significant renovation and decoration, etc count as contributions to the cost of owning the property.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards