We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Average house prices vs household income.
Comments
-
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Oh dear....
Poor Graham still hasn't realised how badly he screwed up. A bit humiliating really.
I'd almost feel sorry for him if it weren't for this....
Which, all things considered, was the icing on the cake.:rotfl:
Although, if it's any consolation Graham, it seems you're not alone on the "doesn't understand percentages" front.
The Following User Says Thank You to Graham_Devon For This Useful Post: Show me >>
Percy1983 (Today)
Seriously, explain it.
Judging by your response, and how stupid I am, apparently, for picking you up on it, why on earth did you use the paragraph yourself for comparison? If gas was up 56% (instead of 46%), would it have totally undone the point you were trying to make?
Think about it.
You blithering fool.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Seriously, explain it.
Judging by your response, and how stupid I am, apparently, for picking you up on it, why on earth did you use the paragraph yourself for comparison? If gas was up 56% (instead of 46%), would it have totally undone the point you were trying to make?
Think about it.
You blithering fool.
If gas had gone up 56% it wouldn’t have made much difference unless you spend most of your income on gas.
I can’t see why Percy keeps thanking your posts I though he was an accountant.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Seriously, explain it.
Seriously? You still don't understand?
Mate, you should have just pretended to get it and quietly left the thread.
But OK, if you insist.... It's your funeral.:D
22+32+17+46% = 117% rise ---- Epic Fail. :rotfl:
I'll keep this to easy round numbers, because we're illustrating a principle here and it doesn't change with actual figures.
Take four categories of essential expenditure and assign a number to them.
Food = £100
Water = £10
Gas = £50
Electricity = £90
The total is £250
Now add percentage increases to the original amount.
Food 22% = £122
Water 17% = £11.70
Gas 46% = £73
Electricity 32% = £118.80
The total is £325.50
So the increase between £250 and £325.50 is not 117%.
It's a 30.2% increase. Versus an average household income increase of 55%.
Do you get it yet?:)“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Seriously, explain it.
Judging by your response, and how stupid I am, apparently, for picking you up on it, why on earth did you use the paragraph yourself for comparison? If gas was up 56% (instead of 46%), would it have totally undone the point you were trying to make?
Think about it.
You blithering fool.
If you're in a hole stop digging.
Let's say you spend £1000/ month only on the categories below to keep it simple and additionally to keep it simpler still it's an equal split of £250.
Therefore..
food +22% = £305/ month
water +32% = £330/ month
electricity +17% = £292.50/ month
gas +46% = £365/ month
New monthly cost = £1292.5 i.e. an increase of £292.50. A weighted increase of 30%. Clearly the point is made even if one of those has risen by 56%.
EDIT: Hamish beat me to it.0 -
If gas had gone up 56% it wouldn’t have made much difference unless you spend most of your income on gas.
Exactly.I can’t see why Percy keeps thanking your posts I though he was an accountant.
No freaking way.....
How does someone that doesn't understand percentages get to be an accountant????:eek:“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Think about it.
You blithering fool.
I did.
And I came to the conclusion you're making yourself look even more stupid than usual.
Which is an absolutely spectacular achievement. :T“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
Graham, there are 4 items of shopping in my basket. Each one has risen by 10%.
Did the cost of my shopping increase by 10%, or 40%?“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
I was thanking the sentiment rather than the maths.
Don't worry I do understand percentages, I am 110% sure of that.Have my first business premises (+4th business) 01/11/2017
Quit day job to run 3 businesses 08/02/2017
Started third business 25/06/2016
Son born 13/09/2015
Started a second business 03/08/2013
Officially the owner of my own business since 13/01/20120 -
Don't worry I do understand percentages
Could you explain it to Graham then, I think he's in need of professional help.:D“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
Carol_Vorderman wrote:In my view, it is pointless for most 14-year-olds starting their GCSE courses, to be force-fed mathematical topics which they will never use, when what they desperately need is to become more comfortable with numbers including percentages and fractions used in the world of finance
As seen in today's headlines.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards