We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Quick Question about Level Term Assurance form?
JMU-95
Posts: 192 Forumite
Hi, just filling out the form for Term Assurance. Is it worth opting for Increasing Benefit or not?
Also the company quoted as cheapest for us are EGON-Scottish Equitable. Now I've heard of the latter but not the former part of this co. Are these reputable enough to go with?
When I opt not to have increasing benefit the cheapest is Norwich Union.
Thanks in advance - just need to know whether it's beneficial to have Increasing Benefit or not.
Also the company quoted as cheapest for us are EGON-Scottish Equitable. Now I've heard of the latter but not the former part of this co. Are these reputable enough to go with?
When I opt not to have increasing benefit the cheapest is Norwich Union.
Thanks in advance - just need to know whether it's beneficial to have Increasing Benefit or not.
0
Comments
-
Is it worth opting for Increasing Benefit or not?
If you need it yes. If not, no.
Also the company quoted as cheapest for us are EGON-Scottish Equitable. Now I've heard of the latter but not the former part of this co. Are these reputable enough to go with?
Aegon own scot eq and recently added their name to the front of Scot Eq (bit like Nationwide Anglia when they came together and probably Scot Eq will vanish in a few years to become just Aegon just as Nationwide is now the name there).
I am not a fan of Scot Eq. Admin can be poor at times although their life assurance dept is seperate to the pensions side and its the latter where they are weaker. They are certainly reputable though.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards