Sony Camcorder

I am looking to buy a new camcorder.
I have always had Sony and think I have narrowed it down to the Sony CX115E HD or the CX130 HD
It looked originally to me as though the 130 had replaced the 115, but when I compared them at John Lewis the 130 does not have night shot whereas the 115 does.
I thought that Sony had this patented system that was good for night shots, eliminating the need for light.
I am a bit confused now.
Can anybody help please?
Thanks

Comments

  • Iconic
    Iconic Posts: 1,021 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts
    edited 24 July 2011 at 6:44AM
    If you compare the two products using this http://www.sony.co.uk/comparison/hdrcx130eb.ceh/hdrcx115eb.ceh it's not very clear.

    But it's a lot clearer when you compare them separately here..

    http://www.sony.co.uk/product/cam-high-definition-on-memory-stick/hdrcx130eb.ceh#pageType=ProductBenefits

    http://www.sony.co.uk/product/cam-high-definition-on-memory-stick/hdr-cx115e

    I have had the 115 for a few months now and I am still trying to find the best way of editing and saving the HD video.
  • MisterNick
    MisterNick Posts: 1,293 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thanks for the reply.
    I put the tech specs next to each other and as you say it is much easier to compare.
    A number of the specs go over my head but it was interesting to see that neither has night shot, which is different to the John Lewis site.
    I thought that the 130 is a later model to the 115 but the functionality in the 115 seems slightly better than the 130.

    I would appreciate any other views on the camcorders

    i might also see what I can get from Sony for the next model up.

    For saving and editing I am using a Mac so was going to go along to the shop for a lesson on their software.
  • MisterNick
    MisterNick Posts: 1,293 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I have had a look at the 155 and 160 camcorders. They are more than I want to spend, but am willing to if there is a big difference.
    The specs don't seem that different (but I am by no means knowledgeable in this area).
    The big difference seemed to be when I looked on You Tube at the tests.
    The 160 seemed to have a better quality.
    Is this because the camera man knew what he was doing, or the settings were different, or am I missing something?

    Thanks for any views
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.