We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Driving in a bus lane

2»

Comments

  • halibut2209
    halibut2209 Posts: 4,250 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    It's not automatically a breach. For example, if the traffic flow in a left hand lane is faster, then undertaking is permitted.

    However, that probably wouldn't apply in this case. The courts would consider it a normal single carriageway, and the only way to pass would be to overtake when it is safe to do so. It's always worth an appeal, but I wouldn't expect it to be successful, unless there was a technical issue with the ticket.
    One important thing to remember is that when you get to the end of this sentence, you'll realise it's just my sig.
  • RENEGADE_2
    RENEGADE_2 Posts: 948 Forumite
    It's not automatically a breach. For example, if the traffic flow in a left hand lane is faster, then undertaking is permitted.

    However, that probably wouldn't apply in this case. The courts would consider it a normal single carriageway, and the only way to pass would be to overtake when it is safe to do so. It's always worth an appeal, but I wouldn't expect it to be successful, unless there was a technical issue with the ticket.

    I know what you mean. There are a few cases where it is permitted in actual fact but I was trying to say that it should not be done for the purpose of simply passing the vehicle in front of you just because the outside lane is closed. For example, it may seem slow to be driving at 30 MPH in a 40 or 50 zone and I know how tempting it can be when it is just one vehicle in front of you choosing to go slow (or maybe a tractor/horse carrier) and it is then that inside overtaking is considered dangerous driving.
  • halibut2209
    halibut2209 Posts: 4,250 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    On the converse though, slow driving can be deemed dangerous as it encourages risks from other drivers.
    One important thing to remember is that when you get to the end of this sentence, you'll realise it's just my sig.
  • Certainly my husband never does "overtaking from the inside" on motorways or anything like that. We're well aware of how dangerous it is, in fact we've seen near misses caused by people acting recklessly and 'overtaking from the inside'.

    In this instance, he's driving down a busy A Road, 3 lanes of traffic, passing a construction site with a lot of muck spilling out onto the road, hence the roadsweeper lorry which is driving very slowly. There is a queue of traffic building up and to ease the flow, he used the empty bus lane to navigate around it/

    We understand that he has broken the rules and we are happy to pay the penalty. However, the circumstances are explainable, whether they're right or not is for the council to decide, the man we spoke to certainly made it sound like it was worth an objection. If we have to pay the fine that we are happy, my husband will understand that "no driving in the bus lane" means "never ever, no matter what". :)
  • RENEGADE_2
    RENEGADE_2 Posts: 948 Forumite
    Absolutely. You have these semi-technical issues and as everyone says, do always appeal council tickets as you have nothing to lose. I only suggest your husband be more careful next time in his own interest.

    As for inside overtaking, or "overgiving" as I call it jokingly, dangerous it may be but I have to be honest; of course I've done it a few times. The worst situation is to be in the outside lane of a motorway when the annoying driver in front of you is going the same speed as the middle-land vehicle causing you to be stuck behind both. It's an irritation, but to be honest, on a good stretch of motorway you can see a good mile ahead of you and can assess the situation. There again, I always tell myself I shalln't do it again and even now I don't recommend it.
  • Just to update, our appeal was rejected. We were able to pay the reduced rate of £30 which was my worry if we appealed I would have to pay more.

    I was given the choice of appealing the decision, but we accept it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.