We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Enforcement of restrictive convenants

We are in the process of buying an old house in Devon. We are currently in a new modern apartment in Bristol so a big change for us. A convenant dating back to around 1880 is in place that states the land can only be used for one private dwelling. About 30 years ago a large part of the front garden was sold off and a house erected there. My solicitor is asking for indemnity insurance from the vendors as the additional house clearly breaches the covenant about one dwelling. I am a little intrigued and confused as to what this insurance is protecting me against, and who? Could the new house be torn down (not sure the old couple that live there would be happy)? Could my house be torn down? Who would enforce it? Does the covenenat apply to the original plot of land, regardless of future subdivision? Could this be a legal headache? I have spoken briefly to my solicitor but she has been a little vague, is this a fairly standard issue with old houses?

Comments

  • kentmum1973
    kentmum1973 Posts: 134 Forumite
    edited 19 July 2011 at 10:12AM
    Interesting. Doesn't sound enforceable, but I am no solicitor. We have a similar covenant on a house we are trying to buy - will keep an eye on this.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.