We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Charge on Deeds
Comments
-
No the charge doesn't, but the original loan was statute barred when they put it on that's the point0
-
paddedjohn wrote: »how long before it becomes statute barred? if the bank made contact in 1994 then doesnt it run from this date?
If it was initially and rightfully secured on OP's property, it never becomes statute barred. But if it was unsecured, then it becomes statute barred 6 years after the last payment or the last acknowledgement of the debt by the debtor. It is a common misconception that the creditor [lender] making contact will restart the clock. This is not the case, although it is possible that the OP acknowledged the debt in response to that contact in 1994.
This is all moot, really. It now hinges on whether the debt was rightfully secured on the property or not. If it was not rightfully secured, then it is statute barred several times over.Dvardysshadow
Thanks for that, so what do I do now
First question is what is the actual document you got from Nationwide evidencing this charge? Any signatures or witnesses on it? Is it actually a valid charge on the property?
And has your property ever been registered with the Land Registry? If so, what is registered there? If you think the property has not been registered, is that actually the case?
I would say you really need to rack your brains for what happened at the time, the taking of the loan and subsequently and look at the evidence you have to decide whether the charge might ever have been authorised by yourselves. When you took the loan, did you understand the difference between secured and unsecured? If you did not understand, then did they slip this one past you when you signed up?Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
The document from Nationwide is a bundle of papers going back over 100 years They are Title Deeds not a land certificate There are 2 photocopies of the registraton of charge form one for me and one for my husband
I knew the loan was unsecured and it was not a problem as I already had a job to start the following year. This was when before my mother's stroke. The bank knew that I would not be starting work and the reason for it. They said leave it and see what happens. The next thing in 1994 they sent a letter saying the account was being transferred to a head office branch and would be frozen. In 1995 I closed the original account as there was no money in it and I was not using it.0 -
In your position, I would just check the Land Registry to be sure that the property is unregistered.The document from Nationwide is a bundle of papers going back over 100 years They are Title Deeds not a land certificate There are 2 photocopies of the registraton of charge form one for me and one for my husband
I knew the loan was unsecured and it was not a problem as I already had a job to start the following year. This was when before my mother's stroke. The bank knew that I would not be starting work and the reason for it. They said leave it and see what happens. The next thing in 1994 they sent a letter saying the account was being transferred to a head office branch and would be frozen. In 1995 I closed the original account as there was no money in it and I was not using it.
Now, as for the photocopies of the registration of charge forms, don't be shy, what is on them?Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
I have heard back from Nationwide regarding this and they say I have to contact the Land Charges department of the Land Registry
Nationwide say it is a Registration of Impending Action There is no follow up to say whether the action took place or not which is why I have to contact the Land Registry. That is definitely what it says.
They were apparently intending to go to court for but it looks as if they never got it done for some reason
Definitely unregistered - no conveyance for full market value since 19680 -
This question is important!!! Without an answer, everything else is a wild goose chase.DVardysShadow wrote: »... Now, as for the photocopies of the registration of charge forms, don't be shy, what is on them?Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
Sorry it says Registration of I mpending Action giving name and property details and then says
Outstanding debt of £7000
Signed by their in house solicitors Signature looks like D E matthews0 -
Sorry about that My sister was last on here and didn't log out. Didn't realise until it posted.0
-
OK, I am not an expert in this, but it looks like a pre emptive action to prevent you from selling the house and leaving the debt unpaid while NatWest take legal action.Strickers2 wrote: »Sorry it says Registration of I mpending Action giving name and property details and then says
Outstanding debt of £7000
Signed by their in house solicitors Signature looks like D E matthews
The time for taking such action is long expired and as it is unilateral [ie you have not agreed to it], it does not have the full standing of being a charge against the property - the worst I think it could do is cause problems on a sale while you get it lifted.
In your position, I would now be checking to ensure that there is no CCJ registered against you. You should know about this if there was, but sometimes these things do slip through. And take legal adviceHi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
Would a CCJ from say 10 years ago still be relevant?No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
