We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Ladders can be dangerous, especially housing ladders

According to PriceWaterHouse, house prices are set to stagnate for the next 10 years (the 70% club is less optimistic)

http://www.ifaonline.co.uk/ifaonline/news/2093049/pwc-house-prices-won-t-recover-2020

Imagine you decide to climb the 'property ladder' in 5 off two year steps between now and 2021 as follows:

£100k
£150k
£250k
£400k
£500k

How much will this process cost you?

Cost of stamp duty, estate agent fees conveyancing (Nationwide calculator) = £58,000
Interest charges = £63,000
Building maintenance costs (say 2% p.a.) = £56,000
Fitting out costs (say £5k per move) = £25,000
Removal costs (say £2k per move) = £10,000
Insurance costs (£500 p.a.) = £5,000
Final sale costs = £11,000
Total cost = £228,000 (before you have paid back any capital).

If you have been on an interest only mortage, then you will be left with £39,000 after redeming the mortgage and this does not include your losses of £228k

If housing prices drop by 50% over the next 10 years, you will lose £478,000 and you will have debts of £461,000 after paying off the mortgage.

Profitable housing ladders have existed in the past but they rely on high wage inflation. The above calculation is based on the assumption that disposable incomes remain static (they are falling at the moment).

The phrase 'housing ladder' is often used by estate agents. It sounds very positive but in reality it is no more than an inducement to take a huge speculative punt. If incomes take off or house prices start from a very low level, the bet pays off. If not, you can lose a lot of money. Either way, the agent gets his/her commission.
«13456

Comments

  • HAMISH_MCTAVISH
    HAMISH_MCTAVISH Posts: 28,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Are you on drugs, macaque?
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • Are you on drugs, macaque?

    I think he must be. Hallucinogenics together with caffeine I would think.

    The caffeine works wonders to toil extremely hard every day trying to find as many pieces of flimsy 'evidence' as he can that house prices are going to fall 30%.

    The hallucinogenics provide the means not only to 'believe' the drivel that he digs up, but also to believe that the more he says it, the more likely it is to happen.
  • macaque wrote: »
    The phrase 'housing ladder' is often used by estate agents. It sounds very positive but in reality it is no more than an inducement to take a huge speculative punt. If incomes take off or house prices start from a very low level, the bet pays off. If not, you can lose a lot of money. Either way, the agent gets his/her commission.

    Have you missed the boat? Stuck in the rental trap? My guess is you're still just renting and paying dead money to a landlord!

    Get on the ladder macaque, before you're priced out forever!

    House prices always go up and property doubles every 10 years, so you can't go wrong buying property.

    Why pay off someone else's mortgage?
    Day to day, little things we can all do to tackle the Credit Crunch.
  • macaque_2
    macaque_2 Posts: 2,439 Forumite
    HAMISH_MCTAVISH
    Are you on drugs, macaque?
    Loughton Monkey
    I think he must be. Hallucinogenics together with caffeine I would think. The caffeine works wonders to toil extremely hard every day trying to find as many pieces of flimsy 'evidence' as he can that house prices are going to fall 30%.
    The hallucinogenics provide the means not only to 'believe' the drivel that he digs up, but also to believe that the more he says it, the more likely it is to happen.
    Zoran Ilievski
    Have you missed the boat? Stuck in the rental trap? My guess is you're still just renting and paying dead money to a landlord! Get on the ladder macaque, before you're priced out forever!
    House prices always go up and property doubles every 10 years, so you can't go wrong buying property. Why pay off someone else's mortgage?

    Oh dear! The bulls have gone for the man rather than the ball again.

    House prices are driven by supply and demand and at the moment we have a complete missmatch on this score. On the supply side there are not enough houses being built to keep up with the influx of immigrants. On the demand side there are not enough people with the incomes/savings to buy the houses. If incomes remain static, the missmatch will only get worse. From a purley investment perspective there are 3 possible decisions to make.

    1. House prices start from a low value and disposable incomes rise - Buy

    2. House prices start from a high value and disposable incomes rise - Hold

    3. House prices start from a high value and disposable incomes remain static - Sell

    The OP was a simple projection based on prices starting at high values (which they are) and incomes remaining static (they are falling at the moment). The numbers are correct and can be checked. Although we have inflation, we don't have wage inflation.

    The bulls have been seduced by a 50 year rise in population combined with rising incomes. What they have failed to recognise is a sea change in the economic climate.
  • peakoil_2
    peakoil_2 Posts: 206 Forumite
    macaque wrote: »
    The OP was a simple projection based on prices starting at high values (which they are) and incomes remaining static (they are falling at the moment). The numbers are correct and can be checked. Although we have inflation, we don't have wage inflation.

    with static house prices and a static wage, how did your example home owner manage to increase his mortgage by 400K to get to the top of the ladder in 10 years?

    what are you trying to prove with this example, if its not to move every 2 years then I think most people already know that is a bad idea even in a booming property market.
  • Loughton_Monkey
    Loughton_Monkey Posts: 8,913 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker Hung up my suit!
    macaque wrote: »
    Oh dear! The bulls have gone for the man rather than the ball again...

    I place on record that despite the accusation above, I am neither a bull nor a bear. I'm simply someone who likes to see a sensible and logical debate on the economy.

    Predicting a further 30% drop in house prices is not sensible. It is not logical. It will not happen.
  • Pimperne1
    Pimperne1 Posts: 2,177 Forumite
    If you wish to own a house, generally speaking, the most dangerous thing about the housing ladder is not being on it.
  • macaque_2
    macaque_2 Posts: 2,439 Forumite
    I place on record that despite the accusation above, I am neither a bull nor a bear. I'm simply someone who likes to see a sensible and logical debate on the economy.

    Predicting a further 30% drop in house prices is not sensible. It is not logical. It will not happen.

    Thank you Captain Sensible. So 100% rise over 10 years is sensible but a 30% correction is not! Give me strength.
  • Pimperne1
    Pimperne1 Posts: 2,177 Forumite
    macaque wrote: »
    Thank you Captain Sensible. So 100% rise over 10 years is sensible but a 30% correction is not! Give me strength.

    How much should they have risen over 10 years in "real" terms then? Doesn't the Nationwide graph have "real" prices back to beneath their long term trend line.

    Penultimate chart:

    http://www.nationwide.co.uk/hpi/historical/Jun_2011.pdf
  • Aberdeenangarse
    Aberdeenangarse Posts: 1,262 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    macaque wrote: »
    Thank you Captain Sensible. So 100% rise over 10 years is sensible but a 30% correction is not! Give me strength.

    No one's saying they'll double in 10 years, but looking at the worst case scenario, they'll probably manage to keep up with inflation over that time frame. In the meantime you'll just have to fight over what little rental accommodation you can find.:rotfl:


    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14135553
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.