We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Payment of Tax on selling Parents home
Greyman_2
Posts: 7 Forumite
My mother is due to go into a residential accommodation, with a Care package. Currently, she does not pay for her care package, as she is in her own home. The local council expect her to pay for the Care package and she has been advised that she must sell the house to fund the Care package.
1. I understand there may be restrictions on signing the property over to family members, under Government legislation and a tax payment is required?
2. If the house was signed over to family members and it was rented out and the funds generated paid for the Care package, can the Council object to this?
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all,
1. I understand there may be restrictions on signing the property over to family members, under Government legislation and a tax payment is required?
2. If the house was signed over to family members and it was rented out and the funds generated paid for the Care package, can the Council object to this?
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all,
0
Comments
-
I think you are thinking of IHT, giving away assets to avoid it is subject to survival taper relief. I don't think it causes an immediate tax bill.Greyman wrote:My mother is due to go into a residential accommodation, with a Care package. Currently, she does not pay for her care package, as she is in her own home. The local council expect her to pay for the Care package and she has been advised that she must sell the house to fund the Care package.
1. I understand there may be restrictions on signing the property over to family members, under Government legislation and a tax payment is required?
It's going to have to be some house to do that. It may be possible but the "signing over to family members" looks like avoidance. Plus what guarantees will the care home have of getting the money compared with knowing it is being sold and will provide a lump sum which will last for many years.Greyman wrote:2. If the house was signed over to family members and it was rented out and the funds generated paid for the Care package, can the Council object to this?
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all,
Have you posted this in the Tax forum, too?A house isn't a home without a cat.
Those are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others.
I have writer's block - I can't begin to tell you about it.
You told me again you preferred handsome men but for me you would make an exception.
It's a recession when your neighbour loses his job; it's a depression when you lose yours.0 -
Bob,
Thanks for the reply, the care package should be £500 per month,
All the best,0 -
Greyman wrote:My mother is due to go into a residential accommodation, with a Care package. Currently, she does not pay for her care package, as she is in her own home. The local council expect her to pay for the Care package and she has been advised that she must sell the house to fund the Care package.
1. I understand there may be restrictions on signing the property over to family members, under Government legislation and a tax payment is required?
2. If the house was signed over to family members and it was rented out and the funds generated paid for the Care package, can the Council object to this?
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all,
Quite simply, there is nothing she can do. If she signs the house over to anyone, she will be depriving herself of assets to avoid care fees and will be treated as though she still has that capital.
This is a subject that comes up time and again on these forums, usually after the elderly person has been told they need residential care. The fact is she has capital to pay for her own care and that is what should be used, rather than expecting the tax payer to pick up the bill.0 -
I don't see why the house can't be rented out though. Leave it in her name and with her pension and the rent from her house it should generate a large portion, if not all, of the care fees if they are £500 a month.(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
2. If the house was signed over to family members and it was rented out and the funds generated paid for the Care package, can the Council object to this?
Provided the care is paid for then what grounds would the Council have to object?
Presumably Mum is moving to sheltered accommodation with a package of care provided by a care agency?
Residential care homes in this area would usually cost upwards of £350 per week. :eek:
Nursing home fees start at £650 per week. :eek:
I work in this field and always struggle to justify people using their savings to fund their care when the identical care their less than careful neighbours receives costs them nothing. :rolleyes: What incentive is there to save for one's old age?
The only benefit that having savings allows is that it "opens more doors" and can give a wider choice of where you may wish to live and be cared for.:A 0 -
how much rent would the house generate though.....
care homes fees here start at around £400 per week0 -
some info...
Your home, your assets, and your care home fees...
http://www.direct.gov.uk/HomeAndCommunity/SocialHousing/CareHomes/CareHomesArticles/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=10031523&chk=W2hEIM0 -
Greyman wrote:My mother is due to go into a residential accommodation, with a Care package. Currently, she does not pay for her care package, as she is in her own home. The local council expect her to pay for the Care package and she has been advised that she must sell the house to fund the Care package.
1. I understand there may be restrictions on signing the property over to family members, under Government legislation and a tax payment is required?
2. If the house was signed over to family members and it was rented out and the funds generated paid for the Care package, can the Council object to this?
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all,
She doesn't have to sell her house if the income for the fees can be generated in another way (e.g. renting it out, paid out of capital, using an insurance policy, or a combination of things).
Even if it can't, she can't be forced to sell her house, although Social Services will put a charge on it and reclaim the money owing when she dies.
She should not have been told that this was the only option. It isn't.(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
Bossyboots wrote:The fact is she has capital to pay for her own care and that is what should be used, rather than expecting the tax payer to pick up the bill.
without wishing to take this off topic, why on earth would tax payers mind an old person who has obviously worked all their lives to be able to afford their own place, the care they need in illness?
i do however mind when someone has not contributed and gets this treatment for free.
good luck OP, why doesnt she try and get a load of credit cards and blow them all to the max on gifts for the family in the form of bonds or something? then when the house is to be sold, the family will get some kind of inheritence ( if that is what the poorly family member was wishing).what is the plural of moose?
slags0 -
If the family wish to avoid paying care home fees (and thereby protect their inheritance) perhaps they ought to let mum live with them in her old age.
However, I find it odd that criminals (including people like Jeffery Archer) get free food and accommodation while our elderly people have to sell their homes.
That said, the taxpayer would be indirectly funding the inheritance of the family members.
It is a difficult subject. The taxpayer cannot afford the answer people want to hear and the other answer causing distress. My vote would be that large hospitals should be provided to house elderly people in care. The cost per person could then be calculated and anyone who goes private could have this as a form of benefit. Obviously, without knowing the numbers it is impossible to know if this is workable.
GGThere are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
