We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Emerging Markets and Commodities
Comments
-
Do you know the composition of the indices in which you have an interest? If not, how do you know that they are something that you would wish to track - even if their charges appear to be cheaper and their performance 'better'? Knowing why a managed fund has over or under-performed an index can be what is important.Living for tomorrow might mean that you survive the day after.
It is always different this time. The only thing that is the same is the outcome.
Portfolios are like personalities - one that is balanced is usually preferable.
0 -
The EM indices are a charged for service. They are not like the FTSE100 which is a publicly available list of the 100 companies listed on the LSE with the highest market capitalisation (total value of all shares).0
-
You should never choose an investment just on the basis of charges.SteveSilva wrote: »I was under the impression they were managed funds rather than simple trackers which charge less?0 -
Perhaps this question still hasn't been adequately answered. The simplest way of telling is probably by comparing the TER of a fund with other funds in the same sector. As a rule of thumb, good tracker funds will have a TER that is significantly less than most other funds in the same sector. If it isn't clear, then the fund is either actively managed or it is too expensive. Expensive tracker funds carry all of the disadvantages of managed funds, but have none of the advantages.SteveSilva wrote: »Some good replies there, its not so clear to me when a fund is a tracker or managed. I know Index usually means tracker and have lower fees, but its not always clear. Isn't there a simple way of telling?
The proper way of telling whether a fund is actively or passively managed is by reading the fund prospectus, which is something you should always do before investing.0 -
The proper way of telling whether a fund is actively or passively managed is by reading the fund prospectus, which is something you should always do before investing.
I just thought that this should be put in bold.Living for tomorrow might mean that you survive the day after.
It is always different this time. The only thing that is the same is the outcome.
Portfolios are like personalities - one that is balanced is usually preferable.
0 -
-
Thanks guys,
I think with specialist markets like EM and Commodities it can be a good idea to go managed.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
