We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Own half a house and brother wants to sell
Comments
-
neverdespairgirl wrote: »There are grounds - he owns half of it!
NDG and G_M - didn't realise it applied in these circumstances too, you learn something new every day, thanks.
I think this just increases pressure on the OP to make an offer on their brother's half of the property, which I think is a perfectly reasonable course of action for everyone concerned if they can agree on a figure that is fair to both parties.If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything0 -
I don't think there is a charging order. That only came up as an (erroneous) explanation of the circumstances in which a judge can order a sale.DVardysShadow wrote: »What? Ownership trumps charging order?
It's a red herring in this case.0 -
I was being tongue in cheekI don't think there is a charging order. That only came up as an (erroneous) explanation of the circumstances in which a judge can order a sale.
It's a red herring in this case.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
Oops! Bit slow tonight!DVardysShadow wrote: »I was being tongue in cheek0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards