We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Photographic question
Comments
-
You wont be able to use those lenses with the digital slr, sorry.
They are adapters to allow them to work in manual only but the only one that was any good was made by canon and changes hands for around £5000 .
However why not look at a negative scanner, you can use your old gear and film and just scan them in to the computer.
Otherwise it may be cheaper just to look at a new system with Sony as the best value bang for buck.
New canon digital SlR cameras are very expensive in comparison and the low range lenses are not very good.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
You wont be able to use those lenses with the digital slr, sorry.
They are adapters to allow them to work in manual only but the only one that was any good was made by canon and changes hands for around £5000 .
However why not look at a negative scanner, you can use your old gear and film and just scan them in to the computer.
Otherwise it may be cheaper just to look at a new system with Sony as the best value bang for buck.
New canon digital SlR cameras are very expensive in comparison and the low range lenses are not very good.
Sorry - I forgot to mention. It's the AE1 program and I believe it has Canon FD lens mount. I thought about a negative scanner, but would I still get good sharp images once I scanned them in. And when I enlarge the image, would I lose definition?0 -
I bought a Sony A700 2nd-hand. Superb camera. Next step will be a 950.
Sony make good cameras, but if I were buying all-new now, I would be buying a Nikon D3100 as these are considered the best ametuer DSLR at the moment.Never Knowingly Understood.
Member #1 of £1,000 challenge - £13.74/ £1000 (that's 1.374%)
3-6 month EF £0/£3600 (that's 0 days worth)0 -
[quote=[Deleted User];44977694]Sorry - I forgot to mention. It's the AE1 program and I believe it has Canon FD lens mount. I thought about a negative scanner, but would I still get good sharp images once I scanned them in. And when I enlarge the image, would I lose definition?[/QUOTE]
Yes, if they're properly scanned at the correct resolution. The definition should be as good if not better than you would get from a conventional film negative enlarger.
And if not, there's always Photoshop Elements...No free lunch, and no free laptop0 -
An old AE1........Excellent camera ................. But hey have alook at the Lumix range, you will be able to pick up a 2nd hand DMC-FZ-7 /8 on Ebay cheap. I have the older 7 version that knocks out super photos.
David0 -
If EOS then yes, but with a crop factor unless you get a full frame DSLR, if you have an FD camera then no.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards