We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Regular, Small Tracker Investment?
Comments
-
In the case of Investment Trusts it does not if you go direct to the company involved. For example F&C (one I picked at random to check) accept £50pm and charge just a 0.2% dealing fee.
And £60 plus VAT annual charge for the investment trust ISA. That is a lot if you are investing £50 per month0 -
inflationiscoming wrote: »And £60 plus VAT annual charge for the investment trust ISA. That is a lot if you are investing £50 per month
Which is why it isn't always worth having investments in an ISA. It also depends on the company, Aberdeen is just £24pa.Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0 -
inflationiscoming wrote: »And £60 plus VAT annual charge for the investment trust ISA. That is a lot if you are investing £50 per month0
-
The OP made no mention of wanting to place it in an ISA and F&C charge no annual fee on the non-ISA version. While I don't know their circumstances I am guessing somebody looking to invest just £50 per month is unlikely to need to put it in an ISA, except perhaps to simplify their tax return.
Always transfer the holdings at a later date into an ISA.0 -
inflationiscoming wrote: »And £60 plus VAT annual charge for the investment trust ISA. That is a lot if you are investing £50 per month
I hold mine outside of an ISA. So my charges are extremely low and growth over 10+ years has been good.0 -
To end the speculation, I am planning to wrap the investment in an ISA. At HL there in an annual fee of 0.5% and no charges for OEICs.
While I appreciate the correction on my understanding of Investment Trusts the necessity to go direct makes it more complicated to research. As I'm happy with the risks of the FTSE All share it seems there is unlikely to be much difference between the 3 options and the OEIC route seems marginally simpler.0 -
Apart from Global exposure and gearing, then yes.
Personally, I found it no narder to research my investment trusts before choosing than to pick an OEIC as it took aroudn the same amt of time, and a simple phone call had the forms to me in days.
One advantage to HL or another ISA wrapper is that once you have an acct with them it will be easier to invest more thru them when hopefully you increase your investments in future and perhaps choose a different OEIC.0 -
Is there any particular reason why you think the FTSE will outperform any other index?0
-
Personally, I found it no narder [sic] to research my investment trusts before choosing than to pick an OEIC as it took aroudn the same amt of timeIs there any particular reason why you think the FTSE will outperform any other index?
The 'bet' that I am making is that, in the long run, the FTSE should provide a better return than any cash ISA/savings account provided by a high street bank. History suggests this should be the case.0 -
Yes, history suggest it sould do better, but some exposure in emerging markets can help. AS can NA, or even europe (Greece aside).
Yes, other markets can mean an exchange risk, but then so do some large FTSE companies who pull in a lot of income/trade in USDs.
I hold a lot of UK equities in pensions and other investments. One of my inv trusts invests in smaller uk companies. But I like to have exposure to all markets as todays economy is Global and when one is doing badly, others can be doing well (for instance Greece and Germany).0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards