We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
charged for sky magazine????
Options

jane_72
Posts: 79 Forumite
has anyone noticed an additional £1.45 being added to their direct debit for sky...
i saw it on one of the forums a bit back that they were gunna start charging for this junk book in january!!! so was gunna call and tell them i did'nt want it nearer the time!!
just checked my bank and an extra £1.45 has been taken out.....
i think it is such a cheek.......to just assume and take money without your permission!!
i saw it on one of the forums a bit back that they were gunna start charging for this junk book in january!!! so was gunna call and tell them i did'nt want it nearer the time!!
just checked my bank and an extra £1.45 has been taken out.....
i think it is such a cheek.......to just assume and take money without your permission!!
What goes around - comes around
give lots and you will always recieve lots
give lots and you will always recieve lots
0
Comments
-
jane_72 wrote:has anyone noticed an additional £1.45 being added to their direct debit for sky...
i saw it on one of the forums a bit back that they were gunna start charging for this junk book in january!!! so was gunna call and tell them i did'nt want it nearer the time!!
just checked my bank and an extra £1.45 has been taken out.....
i think it is such a cheek.......to just assume and take money without your permission!!
is taht not theft taking when permission hasnt been givenNo Links in Signature by site rules - MSE Forum Team 20 -
Hmm, I seem to remember on the last letter with the magazine we got it said that they would charge for the magazine but take the same amount off of our subscription payment. Will keep an eye out for my next payment and see how much goes out.0
-
I was paying £32 and have just checked online banking and am still being charged £32, so at the moment for me they are sticking to what they said in their letter that the cost of the magazine would be taken by reducing the subscripton package cost.
SooI’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the eBay, Auctions, Car Boot & Jumble Sales, Boost Your Income, Praise, Vents & Warnings, Overseas Holidays & Travel Planning , UK Holidays, Days Out & Entertainments boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know.. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com.All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.0 -
I called customer services and told them to cancel the magazine and to reduce my subscription by £1.45, I was told the magazine was free, I told them about the info I had recieved with my magazine but they persisted it was free. The person I was speaking to was foreign so I'm not really sure if my magazine has been cancelled, seems a waste of time phoning them.
I will keep an eye on my direct debits though.0 -
Hopefully somebody here will have a better memory than me, but when Sky's magazine first appeared, there was a row about News Corporation's VAT evasion or tax avoidance (or something similar) where this publication was concerned. Perhaps Sky / Murdoch / News Corporation has now had to come to an accommodation with HM Treasury, hence the seemingly bizarre decision to charge-but-then-not-charge for it -- otherwise, why go to all the administrative bother involved????
None of this alters the fact that the magazine was designed to be a cash-cow, and so delivery to subscribers' homes was deliberately made compulsory -- not for their benefit, but for Sky's.
For Sky is able to approach advertising agencies with "readership figures" showing that 1 million people (or however many are daft enough to put money in Murdoch's coffers) "take the magazine", and on the basis of those figures sell magazine advertising space at £000s per page.
This exploitation of Sky subscribers for commercial purposes ought to have been stamped out long ago, but it hasn't. So every subscriber, whether he / she likes it or not, and regardless of whether he / she has consented to it must continue to accept this junk mail -- which is all Sky Magazine is -- and allow themselves to be used as statistical fodder.
Sky subscribers really ought to have written to News Corporation long since, asking for their rightful share of Sky Magazine's profits, because without News Corporation's unrestricted access to their letterboxes, there'd be no magazine at all. . .0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards