Jet Ski - Fit for Purpose?

Pricy147

It basically comes back to whether I have any legal grounding under UK law. I dont think anyone would argue against a ski lasting for < 70 hours being not fit for purpose - assuming service, maintenance history, no accident etc (obviously I need to prove that).

Im noticing that Kawasaki Morots CEO details are very hard to come across. Seems to be a president named Takeshi Teranishi - but contact details seem scarce! This would be my plan B!

wealdroam

Pricy147 wrote: »

It basically comes back to whether I have any legal grounding under UK law.

Yes, that's right.

Shaun from Africa explained in post #11 that you would be wasting your time when he said...

shaun_from_Africa wrote: »

Trying to sue kawasaki would be a waste of both time and money as there was no contract or agreement between them and the OP.

Even the original purchaser wouldn't have much of a chance at getting anything out of them through legal action (unless the jetski was purchased directly from them).
This is because the statutory rights given to consumers by the SOGA are between the purchaser and the retailer and not the manufacturer. (unless the goods were bought directly from the manufacturer).