PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

What if landlord wants me to leave but I don't want to

2»

Comments

  • moneybunny123
    moneybunny123 Posts: 538 Forumite
    casper_g wrote: »
    How is it different? It's different because a tenancy can basically only be ended by both parties agreeing or by a court order. But if I hire a car for 24 hrs, and sign a lease document stating that I'll return it within 24hrs, then I AM agreeing. To then decide not to return it and await a court order is insolence!

    As to why it is different, it just always has been. Tenancies are fundamentally different from any sort of hire agreement for a "thing" like a car, bike, TV, whatever, because the land and building a person lives in is fundamentally different from any of their other possessions, in law and in reality. It has always been regarded differently, and that's not about to change.

    If you don't like the law on tenancies, then invest your capital in some other business, not renting out residential property. I intend to! My first (and last) tenant vacated at the weekend.


    As I said, I knew I'd get slated for having a contrary opinion.
  • moneybunny123
    moneybunny123 Posts: 538 Forumite
    If I move into a rented property (as I most likely will in the forthcoming months, to ensure I'm chain free when I see a house I want to purchase), I will do so knowing that it is a TEMPORARY measure. I will walk into it with my eyes wide open and I will understand completely if the Landlord ends the tenancy at the end of the fixed term, or at any time after that. YES, it will be an inconvenience, but few things aren't in life.
  • googler
    googler Posts: 16,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    If I hired a car for 24hrs and didn't bother to return it and instead continued to drive around in it until I was taken to court, nobody would have any sympathy for me. How is it any different?!

    Because your tenants are making their HOME in the property which you own, not merely using a moveable asset, such as a car?

    Possibly also because the current legislation has developed over the years based on the experience of landlords and tenants alike, and has come down in favour of the tenant because of previous abuse by landlords? Maybe, I don't know for certain.

    As someone said, if you don't like the current legislation, you may be in the wrong business, and you may wish to lobby your MP for change.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.