We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Can the LibDems sink any lower?

StevieJ
Posts: 20,174 Forumite


The answer appears to be yes
maybe back to Victorian times? unfair comparison really, things were improving back then.
Threats meted out to the weakest poodle like Union movement in a hundred years.

Threats meted out to the weakest poodle like Union movement in a hundred years.
http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/Cable-Heckled-On-Strike-Law-skynews-789352377.html?x=0Mr Cable warned that if unions persist in co-ordinated strike action, "the pressure on us to act [by changing the law] will ratchet up."
'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
0
Comments
-
That heart which beats on the left appears to have shifted somewhat...It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.0
-
But:
1. The right to strike is guaranteed by european law and
2. There is no coordinated strike action - in fact, IIRC, Thatcher made coordinated strike action illegal.“The ideas of debtor and creditor as to what constitutes a good time never coincide.”
― P.G. Wodehouse, Love Among the Chickens0 -
But:
...2. There is no coordinated strike action - in fact, IIRC, Thatcher made coordinated strike action illegal.
Her Government did I think. However, according to the article:Union leaders have warned 750,000 teachers, lecturers, civil servants and other public sector workers could take co-ordinated strike action on June 30 in the biggest outbreak of industrial unrest for years.
If it's meant to be illegal to take coordinated strike action and there is a loophole in the law then it's probably reasonable to change the law.0 -
But:
1. The right to strike is guaranteed by european law and
2. There is no coordinated strike action - in fact, IIRC, Thatcher made coordinated strike action illegal.
Obviously people should have the right to strike.... but that doesnt mean they have the 'right' to being employed on their return.0 -
Obviously people should have the right to strike.... but that doesnt mean they have the 'right' to being employed on their return.
Do you not see any contradiction in what you have typed?It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.0 -
I wish people would stop being beastly to the Lib Dems. Its their last parliament existing as an actual party. Have some respect.0
-
The answer appears to be yes
maybe back to Victorian times? unfair comparison really, things were improving back then.
Threats meted out to the weakest poodle like Union movement in a hundred years.
http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/Cable-Heckled-On-Strike-Law-skynews-789352377.html?x=0
Come to think of it, a hundred years nearly spans the period back to the time when they last had any power :eek:'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
lemonjelly wrote: »Do you not see any contradiction in what you have typed?
Intended I think.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards